i have actually have no doubt there was some form of voter fraud but it wasnt huge and didn’t affect the result
But by the same token just like how the other media outlets to this day try make out trumps win due to Russian collusion .
But I think you will find in both examples there was outrage on Twitter before these “mainstream “ media ran with these topics
Most of the topics there days from the “murdoch media “ come from Twitter as - rare to see an article that doesn’t refer to Twitter clown posts
Here's the major difference I see.
Murdoch publications have the likes of idiots like Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, Andrew Bolt, James Morrow, Rowan Dean, etc who make up bullshit, sensationalise it and play it off as propaganda. So these are mainstream voices with a massive outreach.
Whereas the nut cases on twitter, it's some lone individual who has a voice on twitter, that's it, end of. But what happens is that murdoch publications go trawling through the likes of twitter, to find these nut case voices and they propagate them to make it seem like there's this massive movement about that particular fruit loop idea. When in actual reality, it's one lone voice on twitter (e.g.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3648218/woman-marries-train-station-sante-fe/)
As far as the election lie goes, this was instigated by Trump and his team. His propagation outlets, i.e. Murdoch media, helped propagate this.
In regards to Russian collusion, that terminology came from Trump's team and they chose that particular wording for a specific reason, i.e. it didn't happen, when in actual fact the Mueller report investigated
inteference by Russia, not collusion