LordSidious66
Kennel Legend
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2011
- Messages
- 9,640
- Reaction score
- 6,613
I guess he will likey take over the training session and coaching next week.
I guess he will likey take over the training session and coaching next week.
You need to intentionally kick the ball.. he clearly dropped it and as a last ditch attempt to avoid the knock on put boot to ball- it’s a knock on.Can someone please enlighten me on the correct ruling from the Foxx's first no try?
I thought that after he knocked on he actually attempted to kick the ball rather than the ball just hit his foot.
I thought the rule was that he needed to make an attempt to kick in order to play on..... but I could be wrong.
Unless it's Billy Slater in Storm colours, who by the way actually got away with the ball touching the ground first and they ruled that it was an attempted drop kick.... a metre out of the ingoal, who then scored a try.You need to intentionally kick the ball.. he clearly dropped it and as a last ditch attempt to avoid the knock on put boot to ball- it’s a knock on.
Try to Billy Slater years ago... No try for everyone else ever since lolCan someone please enlighten me on the correct ruling from the Foxx's first no try?
I thought that after he knocked on he actually attempted to kick the ball rather than the ball just hit his foot.
I thought the rule was that he needed to make an attempt to kick in order to play on..... but I could be wrong.
Here is the tackle. He was tackled before he even the touched bloody thing. Shows how inept the bunker is [emoji23][emoji23]He falls after a shoulder to shoulder and even then he still reaches out and knocks it on
You are retardedHere is the tackle. He was tackled before he even the touched bloody thing. Shows how inept the bunker is [emoji23][emoji23]
Wow calling someone 'retarted' because they have a different point of view. Childish much.You are retarded
He says in a thread about 3 correct decisions being proof of games being ‘fixed’ against usChildish much.
Look I am going to be the adult here and agree to disagree with you without resorting to childish insults. Have a nice day.He says in a thread about 3 correct decisions being proof of games being ‘fixed’ against us
the fact he ran and finished the play off by scoring after the whistle was blown a few times showed that JAC knew it was going to be a try and that he made an attempt to kick it, and then the fact we werent allowed to challenge it (probably because it wouldve been called a try) was an absolute joke. 'your 10 seconds is up' is ludicrous. why not just send it up as a no try/allow the challenge if the ref was so confident?Can someone please enlighten me on the correct ruling from the Foxx's first no try?
I thought that after he knocked on he actually attempted to kick the ball rather than the ball just hit his foot.
I thought the rule was that he needed to make an attempt to kick in order to play on..... but I could be wrong.
Wouldn’t be surprised if our win percentage with this ref is lower than thatHow are we seriously still blaming refs when our coach has the worst win percentage in Bulldogs history?
Because it was us, and Because the Raiders needed to win on their 40th anniversary night in front of all their old boys.... that's all I got.the fact he ran and finished the play off by scoring after the whistle was blown a few times showed that JAC knew it was going to be a try and that he made an attempt to kick it, and then the fact we werent allowed to challenge it (probably because it wouldve been called a try) was an absolute joke. 'your 10 seconds is up' is ludicrous. why not just send it up as a no try/allow the challenge if the ref was so confident?
If there was fix then we would of not won any of our challenges as they were 50/50 at bestRapana done 2 foul plays and still didnt get sin binned... shoulder to the head and impeding Jac without the ball in a try scoring opportunity... and you still think there isnt an agenda
3 challenges won in a row
dufty impeded by croker denying a certain try
jac try denied by a comical obstruction call
Jac runaway try denied after Cummins claimed he knocked on but he kicked the ball before it hit the ground and refused the challenge when we asked for it
This thread is not about our own game so keep it relevant
Sounds legitI hear that Isaac is hearing that there was a secret memo sent out to all referee's and linesman/woman/genderfluid and video refs that stated a mandatory 5-6 penaltys per game must be awarded against Canterbury. Cash bonus's will be paid to officials that come up with creative reasons for sin binnings and send offs.
Definetely not a conspiracy..