- Joined
- Nov 15, 2013
- Messages
- 73,103
- Reaction score
- 78,857
Then Baz cried and we upper our offer. Then Elliott repaid Baz and the club with an off field scandal, should've sacked the **** then and there.Yeh parra chased hard and upped his value
Then Baz cried and we upper our offer. Then Elliott repaid Baz and the club with an off field scandal, should've sacked the **** then and there.Yeh parra chased hard and upped his value
No they took less to stay together to get under the cap. Some had to go & others didn't want to take the cut.I could have sworn we operated under a reduced cap for a year or two after. I know players had to take a pay cut to get cap compliant but I thought we also had less to spend in the following seasons as part of the punishment.
I found this:No they took less to stay together to get under the cap. Some had to go & others didn't want to take the cut.
Had a good coward punch on him......Danny Williams was another Roosters reject lauded for his abilities.
I think we know the answer to that one.I can't find anything about us operating under a reduced cap after 2002. It's interesting though that the Broncos this season are similarly like the Bulldogs of 2002 except they have been allowed to shed players. Even though they won games by being over the cap like us in 2002 why were they not stripped of points fined & audited like us?
100%The salary cap is responsible for so many clubs poor roster management. It's ridiculous that clubs are forced into spending 95% of their cap and having to pay overs for players of lower quality.
No. Our clubs a basketcase if that is what we offered himWtf $500k a season. His manager is a genius.
I was told the Warriors offered him a little more actually. (was about 20K a year from memory)Yeh parra chased hard and upped his value
Not sure what the roosters payed him.They didn't spend a fortune in him.