- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 22,559
- Reaction score
- 23,676
Or just tell em someone stole your real kid!!!Kid would be disowned. And I would call the cops, saying this thieving bastard stole that jersey as I never gave them that amount of money.
Or just tell em someone stole your real kid!!!Kid would be disowned. And I would call the cops, saying this thieving bastard stole that jersey as I never gave them that amount of money.
Many? Who?!?!? Lol stop sperging
What’s your point lol, who even uses that word. I see an article though saying why you shouldn’t use Christianphobia lol
That's because you have no answer to thatYour slippery slope fallacy isn't going to work on me
Legit first time I've seen it.
I blame the dogs winning 2 in a row and looking like a good football teamI can’t believe what I started..but great reading!!
Lol! Looks like it’s time for the mother of all threads… ‘Sack the Kennel..’I blame the dogs winning 2 in a row and looking like a good football team
Even the footy discussion section seems very slow, without much to discuss
We don't have enough drama going on at the club to spend more time discussing in the footy section, damn it!!!!
We are making our own drama by posting in here. A week without the NRL & we have stooped to this. lolWe don't have enough drama going on at the club to spend more time discussing in the footy section, damn it!!!!
Bet the club will be so happy if that happened. (not the thread, about Sack the Kennel. If it really happened) The I know someone who walked near a member of the board 14 years ago & here is the football goss, will be no more. (sad face)Lol! Looks like it’s time for the mother of all threads… ‘Sack the Kennel..’
Bro those robes/clothing is comfortable as, especially in the desert.Technically did Jesus wear a dress. Oh that's right it was called a tunic. But he had long hair. Hope I am not struck by lightening after posting his.
Ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer.That's because you have no answer to that
CopiumAsk a stupid question, get a stupid answer.
I'll answer with an analogy...
We allow Christianity in Australia, why don't we also allow religious human sacrifice? What are we, bigots?
Slippery slope fallacy is stupid and only used by ultra Conservatives who think they're being smart. There's a reason it's called a fallacy.
I don’t think it was a stupid question at all. It’s a question based on the standard you set.Ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer.
I'll answer with an analogy...
We allow Christianity in Australia, why don't we also allow religious human sacrifice? What are we, bigots?
Slippery slope fallacy is stupid and only used by ultra Conservatives who think they're being smart. There's a reason it's called a fallacy.
BadlyCopium
"you accept transgender so why don't you accept a man in lingerie in public?" (paraphrasing)I don’t think it was a stupid question at all. It’s a question based on the standard you set.
The only defense you have is to label it a slippery slope. I mean we can probably give that label to many comments made on TK. But I get it, it’s your go to card when all else fails. Your analogy is ridiculous. If my question is a slippery slope, I’d say it’s about 1000th of a millimeter down the slope. Your analogy is about 1000 km’s down the slope.
Do you know this from personal experience.Bro those robes/clothing is comfortable as, especially in the desert.
Copium
The only thing worse than trolls are trolling bigots who think they are better than everyone else. It's just sad.Badly
Yeah I have a few as gifts from relos overseasDo you know this from personal experience.
Cope more"you accept transgender so why don't you accept a man in lingerie in public?" (paraphrasing)
You don't think that's a stupid question? You think that's not a lame slippery slope argument phrased as a question?
I honestly wasn't going to dignify the response with an answer because I thought it was an obvious troll response. I honestly thought you didn't equate the two. I am now seeing the actual issue. You really believe they are no different.
So to actually answer your question. Because transgender is accepted in modern society as something a person is. It's accepted because people who are transgender are not transgender by choice. They are who they are.
A man dressing in lingerie is either suffering a mental illness episode or he's just trying to piss people off. Transgender or not. It's considered unacceptable.
The fact that Conservatives can't tell the difference between an actual person who is actually transgender and a bloke dressing in lingerie in public, that shows the key issue here.
So again I bring up the Catholicism vs human sacrifice. Because that is the only way I figure that you can understand how totally different the two are.