Minion
Kennel Established
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
- Messages
- 587
- Reaction score
- 248
We can't prove that the NRL is actually corrupt, but 99.99% of people watching the free to air telecast were certain of 1, 2 and 3. How can it be remotely possible that the officials could draw the opposite conclusion to everyone else?1. He was held
2. He planted short
3. It was a double movement
4. The NRL is corrupt
It was a plain black and white decision - no try in anyone's book.
The Dogs played poorly and I admit that the better team won on the day, but in saying that the Dogs never got an opportunity to recover after that howler of a decision followed by two blatant forward passes in the lead up to the Rooster's next try. Bulldogs momentum and season = gone.
Last edited by a moderator: