George Pell

[Wahesh]

The allegations against Pell never made any sense. The idea that someone could grab a choir boys dick in a corridor with 50 or so ppl around and no one saw a thing?

Ridiculous.

what is also ridiculous is that the plaintiffs identity is still protected by law despite the Pell being found not guilty. Everyone should know his name and a spotlight should be shone on him so we can see who this guy is.

Agreed!

 

[Wahesh]

I wouldn't be surprised if they trace the money to one of the judges that ruled that there was sufficient doubt to convict either.

Well the first appeal outcome did surprise me. The 3 judges actually went to the Church to look around and try and piece together how the events could've possibly taken place with the information they currently had. 2 judges found him guilty 1 not guilty. I mean I don't think that judges would take bribes as they'd have enough money as it is, but that's still a real headscratcher.

 

[Chris Harding]

For me, the issue with Pell is not what he personally did, but what he allowed to happen while he was in charge. There is no doubt that he had to be involved in cover ups of pedophilia within the church. No way it couldn't have come before his notice.

The church was covering up these incidents for decades in Australia, the UK and USA. Who knows what was going on in other countries?
The top brass could not have been ignorant for so long, as they were complicit in moving offending priests away from the towns where they were actively assaulting children.

 

[KambahOne]

For me, the issue with Pell is not what he personally did, but what he allowed to happen while he was in charge. There is no doubt that he had to be involved in cover ups of pedophilia within the church. No way it couldn't have come before his notice.

The church was covering up these incidents for decades in Australia, the UK and USA. Who knows what was going on in other countries?
The top brass could not have been ignorant for so long, as they were complicit in moving offending priests away from the towns where they were actively assaulting children.

Thanks for posting this.

 

[Dawgfather]

Cardinal George Pell: New claim of mystery $2m sent from Vatican to Australia

New claims of a mystery $2 million wired from the Vatican to Australia between early 2017 and mid-2018 have emerged in the alleged corruption scandal linked to Cardinal George Pell’s trial.

www.news.com.au

 

[CaptainJackson]

Victoria Police says it's not investigating Vatican payments without evidence of 'suspicious activity' - ABC News

amp.abc.net.au

 

[Mr 95%]

For me, the issue with Pell is not what he personally did, but what he allowed to happen while he was in charge. There is no doubt that he had to be involved in cover ups of pedophilia within the church. No way it couldn't have come before his notice.

The church was covering up these incidents for decades in Australia, the UK and USA. Who knows what was going on in other countries?
The top brass could not have been ignorant for so long, as they were complicit in moving offending priests away from the towns where they were actively assaulting children.

I agree.

 

[The DoggFather]

Victoria Police says it's not investigating Vatican payments without evidence of 'suspicious activity' - ABC News

amp.abc.net.au

Not investigating? Looks like the Jesuit tentacles reach all the way down under...

 

[CaptainJackson]

Not investigating? Looks like the Jesuit tentacles reach all the way down under...

Or there's no credible evidence and this is just another smear campaign against the victims

 

[The DoggFather]

Or there's no credible evidence and this is just another smear campaign against the victims

Who knows bro, the Vatican has to be one of the most corrupt organisations on earth.

I just hope the victims get justice and the evil fucks involved get what they deserve.

PS obviously aimed at the corrupt factions of the Vatican and not the innocent people and Catholics.

 

[Dawgfather]

Regarding these wire transfers from the vatican:

Andrew Bolt reported last night that one of Pell's accusers purchased a half million dollar property just one month after one of the vaticans payments arrived in Australia.

Could be complete coincidence and the two events may have no relation to each other whatsoever.

 

[CaptainJackson]

Regarding these potential bribes from the vatican:

Andrew Bolt reported last night that one of Pell's accusers purchased a half million dollar property just one month after one of the vaticans payments arrived in Australia.

Could be complete coincidence and the two events may have no relation to each other whatsoever. But it certainly raises eyebrows (at a minimum).

Im reporting this to said individual to sue you for defamation

 

[Dawgfather]

Im reporting this to said individual to sue you for defamation

Pell had many accusers (the case which went to trial was only one of those accusers). I don't know which accuser Andrew Bolt is talking about.

I only quoted the reporting by Andrew Bolt which can be found here:

I did not make any accusations myself or any assertions as I don't know anything other than what Andrew Bolt reported.

Btw good luck with your defamation proceedings. Given I didn't mention anyone by name and the public does not know the identity of the Pell accuser (in the case that went to trial), you will have a good time finding a court to do anything other than laugh in your face.

 

[Alan79]

Regarding these potential bribes from the vatican:

Andrew Bolt reported last night that one of Pell's accusers purchased a half million dollar property just one month after one of the vaticans payments arrived in Australia.

Could be complete coincidence and the two events may have no relation to each other whatsoever. But it certainly raises eyebrows (at a minimum).

The idea that people consider Andrew Bolt to be an unbiased reporter and anything that comes from his mouth as honest raises eyebrows for me.

 

[Dawgfather]

The idea that people consider Andrew Bolt to be an unbiased reporter and anything that comes from his mouth as honest raises eyebrows for me.

You may be right.

All I'm saying is that Andrew Bolt has said on the record last night that one of the accusers made a property transaction shortly after the vatican funds are alleged to have been wired to Australia.

The two events (property transaction and vatican funds) may have nothing to do with each other.

 

[CaptainJackson]

Pell had many accusers (the case which went to trial was only one of those accusers). I don't know which accuser Andrew Bolt is talking about.

I only quoted the reporting by Andrew Bolt which can be found here:

I did not make any accusations myself or any assertions as I don't know anything other than what Andrew Bolt reported.

Btw good luck with your defamation proceedings. Given I didn't mention anyone by name and the public does not know the identity of the Pell accuser (in the case that went to trial), you will have a good time finding a court to do anything other than laugh in your face.

You made an accusation its in there in your post. I'll be sending this off to the police

 

[Dawgfather]

You made an accusation its in there in your post. I'll be sending this off to the police

How about you tell us all what you think my accusation was, without making up things that aren't written in black and white.

 

[Dawgfather]

You made an accusation its in there in your post. I'll be sending this off to the police

btw which one is it. Are you going to get someone to sue me for defamation or are you going to 'get the police'.

You do realise the differences between criminal and civil law. Don't you?

 

[CaptainJackson]

btw which one is it. Are you going to get someone to sue me for defamation or are you going to 'get the police'.

You do realise the differences between criminal and civil law. Don't you?

Sending it to the victim for a civil case and sending it the police for an avo to protect the victims from your evilness

Victoria Police have already stated they are not investigating because there are no suspicions

 

[Dawgfather]

Sending it to the victim for a civil case and sending it the police for an avo to protect the victims from your evilness

Victoria Police have already stated they are not investigating because there are no suspicions

Haha an avo.

im not sure what your agenda is with trying to be a white knight. It’s not even clear who you are defending given the alleged victims name has never been published. Hence the reason why no defamation or avo would have any legs because no one has been identified.

how would you even know the identity of the alleged victim given their name was never published.

Personally, my agenda is simply to discuss topical issues. I have no interest in harming anyone - hence why I simply said Andrew bolt had reported something.