- Joined
- Oct 22, 2018
- Messages
- 9,462
- Reaction score
- 15,723
Which "club", us or the Warriors?We may be hearing more about P Goulds involvement at the club in the future[emoji6]
Go Dogs
Which "club", us or the Warriors?We may be hearing more about P Goulds involvement at the club in the future[emoji6]
That's not winning the games then, you want him to always be the one to "step up"BY sitting back when he needs to step up, ie the last 20 last week
by being injured, or coming back to early and having no involvement in games
No one expects him to always have to step up when it counts, when the game is on the line. But, he never does.That's no winning the games then, you want him to always be the one to "step up"
I can't remember once where he fucked up or made an error in judgement that "cost us the game"
60%, that’s generous!Honestly it sounds like he wants too much money. I don't wanna pay overs again for someone who plays 60% of games.
36 / 60 = 60%.60%, that’s generous!
Look I get what you say. I agree it will be best for the Club & Foran to go seperate ways.No one expects him to always have to step up when it counts, when the game is on the line. But, he never does.
He doesn’t fuck up in the big moments of a game or make a mistake that cost us, because he avoids it like the plague..
Foran when fit is a fearless clever footballer that makes shit happen. But he has always had Stacey Jones, Benji, Shaun Johnson, Matt Orford, DCE or similar on the park with him that wanted the ball in thier hands when it matters. KForan is not a big moment player.
And would have been substantially less if not for the good timing of corona for foran...36 / 60 = 60%.
Accurate. Still not good value for your most expensive player.
The emotional connection relates to Foran in his Manly days, what is amazing is that they can't get over what he did at Manly 5 years ago, but forget what he has been in the last 5 years.I can see the value in keeping foz if no other alternatives can be obtained... but there should be a clear limit that no rationale management should exceed.. seems like a few of our members on here show a bit too much emotional connection with foran...
That’s what all managers do, especially to teams that already have to pay overs!Snippet in the Newcastle Herald today says the Foran link to the Knights was a total fabrication . Just his manager trying to create interest in him to get his price up and try and force the dogs hand.
That’s very disappointing. What has the world come to when you can’t trust a player manager ???
The article in the threat about Georgalis wanting to go to the Cowboys they quote Georgalis as saying:Snippet in the Newcastle Herald today says the Foran link to the Knights was a total fabrication . Just his manager trying to create interest in him to get his price up and try and force the dogs hand.
That’s very disappointing. What has the world come to when you can’t trust a player manager ???
Yes I know mate . I was being sarcasticThat’s what all managers do, especially to teams that already have to pay overs!
A tampon stays in longer than him.Hes a tampon
every time is out the team has to change the way they play, players coming in and out, combinations affected in the most key position.
He costs more then he is worth. No doubt he provides good value on occasion and we play better as a team. But very likely thats cause hes surrounded by rubbish in the other spine positions
Just because he’s named 36 times doesn’t mean he’s played 36 times. How many times has he started a game and not finished it, 5-10 games?36 / 60 = 60%.
Accurate. Still not good value for your most expensive player.
And how many of the 36 were returning from injury and he took 3 to 4 games to work his way up to being a passenger for 30mins as per his standard?Just because he’s named 36 times doesn’t mean he’s played 36 times. How many times has he started a game and not finished it, 5-10 games?
but I agree with the point overall, poor investment