- Joined
- Aug 6, 2016
- Messages
- 25,537
- Reaction score
- 29,135
Oh it will be programmable alrightI was thinking exactly that yesterday, but they will never allow it if they can't control, manipulate or overrule it.
Oh it will be programmable alrightI was thinking exactly that yesterday, but they will never allow it if they can't control, manipulate or overrule it.
Have they installed the SportsBet upload yet?Oh it will be programmable alright
The problem is no-one cares.Accountability for having a lopsided officiating is what we ask. It's clear Cummins only saw things one way last Friday, yet he gets PROMOTED to do this Saturdays 730 Cowboys first home game. Where's the accountability for costing the Dogs any chance to win the last game?
This is the major problem with rugby league. The 6 agains are completely subjective....where and when they are blown determines games. As Deano used to say....we had 17 guys who busted their ass last Friday, but due to the unfair officiating were given no chance to win the game. If the NRL can't see this then they are kidding that the game is in "good shape"
How much do you want each of us to tip in lolIF the refs could keep the deficit under 50 points against us this weekend I’m sure we’d equally appreciate it LOL
Our vocal sponsor Mr Arthur Laundy has been unusually quiet of late hasn’t he lolllHow much do you want each of us to tip in lol
Yes now that you mention it.Our vocal sponsor Mr Arthur Laundy has been unusually quiet of late hasn’t he lolll
Will someone go and dust off old Barry Barnes? Get him to Bankwest
Sorry princess but the bulldogs don’t need to tell you every detail of what they doIt’s been almost a week, where is this “action” that we have been hearing about? What action exactly is Barrett going to take, a questioning email? A zoom meeting, will it be streamed, I‘m sure we would all like to know the 6 examples of Cummins ignoring the Knought‘s infringements? Perhaps a face to face sit down with Annesley? Whatever form it takes maybe it is scheduled for Friday afternoon or Saturday morning to have maximum effect before our next game? Tick tick it’s getting cold, some action, before round 2 makes everyone forget what happened in round 1.
Go Dogs
6-agains should be limited to the attacking half, and the captain should be able to call a penalty if they want a penalty kick for 2pts.One of the Problems with this 6 again rule is that because they just happen on the fly, there is no understanding to the team it is against of what they are for. Captains don’t get an opportunity to be told what they are for. I think they are being given Willy Nilly for the most minor of indiscretions. Unless there is blatant laying on the tackle slowing the attacking team down, fuck them off and just give a penalty. It’s too unfair to blow multiple 6 agains against teams. I’m really not a fan of it.
V'Landy's mentioned in the Matt Johns show last night that he would like some better clarity about how they communicate what a six again was for. So it's on the radar.One of the Problems with this 6 again rule is that because they just happen on the fly, there is no understanding to the team it is against of what they are for. Captains don’t get an opportunity to be told what they are for. I think they are being given Willy Nilly for the most minor of indiscretions. Unless there is blatant laying on the tackle slowing the attacking team down, fuck them off and just give a penalty. It’s too unfair to blow multiple 6 agains against teams. I’m really not a fan of it.
Good. I thought 6 agains were mainly born off the idea that the defending team were deliberately laying on or slowing down the tackled player time and time again on their line in order to entice the attacking team to forego an attempt to score a try and rather take 2 points instead. As the defending team were tiring in defence and a 4 pointer was imminent.V'Landy's mentioned in the Matt Johns show last night that he would like some better clarity about how they communicate what a six again was for. So it's on the radar.
That first paragraph is what I’ve been saying since the 6 again was introduced. Only in the attacking half, otherwise it doesn’t benefit the team much.6-agains should be limited to the attacking half, and the captain should be able to call a penalty if they want a penalty kick for 2pts.
A 6-again on the first tackle should become a new 8-tackle set, and a new 7-tackle set if on the 2nd tackle. Giving a 6-again on the first tackle of a set off the defensive tryline is useless.
And 6-again Ben should be removed from first grade. Permanently.
Did you honestly expect the NRL to address this? It was more about Baz calling them out and putting them on notice. And even if they did address it, they'd probably say as usual that they reviewed it and every call was correct blah blah blah..It’s been almost a week, where is this “action” that we have been hearing about? What action exactly is Barrett going to take, a questioning email? A zoom meeting, will it be streamed, I‘m sure we would all like to know the 6 examples of Cummins ignoring the Knought‘s infringements? Perhaps a face to face sit down with Annesley? Whatever form it takes maybe it is scheduled for Friday afternoon or Saturday morning to have maximum effect before our next game? Tick tick it’s getting cold, some action, before round 2 makes everyone forget what happened in round 1.
Go Dogs
So it should be.V'Landy's mentioned in the Matt Johns show last night that he would like some better clarity about how they communicate what a six again was for. So it's on the radar.