News Brittany Higgins enquiry

[Hacky McAxe]

And how exactly would he pay anyway?
All I see is good money being thrown after bad.

Sexual favours of course.

 

[steeliz]

Wonder if Channel 7 will buy him a steak dinner and a couple of hookers so he can drown his sorrows tonight?

 

[wendog33]

Wonder if Channel 7 will buy him a steak dinner and a couple of hookers so he can drown his sorrows tonight?

Coupla bags too

 

[DinkumDog]

Sexual favours of course.

Touché, well played .

He was living off 7’s largesse and her 10’s sympathy but in the end this was largely two media companies chasing a salacious story. Not a good look for anyone.

 

[wendog33]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779734256639783315

 

[wendog33]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779722713512493082

 

[wendog33]

 

[Berries]

I cannot wait to never hear these three worms names again

 

[Kaz]

With her lying in court a few times, as I have said, I would have found him not guilty.

 

[wendog33]

 

[wendog33]

Justice Lee says he’s “satisfied” #Lehrmann told “deliberate lies” & was “mendacious” in his evidence. Says Lehrmann gave “false evidence” on a “litany” of matters inc that he was apparently reprimanded by Reynolds & how he entered Parliament House.

 

[Berries]

View attachment 106605

I’ve followed zero of this case, so she’s lied at several points but judge says that’s fine because she was emotional? Am I reading that right? Wtf

 

[wendog33]

I’ve followed zero of this case, so she’s lied at several points but judge says that’s fine because she was emotional? Am I reading that right? Wtf

I guess he is factoring in the emotional state of a victim of rape, never having given consent. He is in the highest echelon of Federal Court Judges in Australia so it's likely he knows how to discern the better of the 2 liars?

 

[wendog33]

Justice Lee says “contrary” to Lehrmann’s evidence, “he did spend most of the night with Ms Higgins & as the night wore on he was aware of her drinking & towards the end of the evening he was encouraging her to drink well beyond the grounds of sobriety”.

 

[wendog33]

 

[DinkumDog]

I cannot wait to never hear these three worms names again

Of course Wilkinson is on her high horse with her statement today even though the judge was critical of her behaviour in court too. Who would employ her now? Her and that pirate clown deserve each other.

 

[Northern Beaches dog]

Can someone help me out here? I am utterly confused. Please feel free to correct me where i am wrong.
This Bruce guy initially went to trial for rape, was found not guilty.
Based on that he thought that he was defamed and went to sue various people as he was found not guilty.
The judge then today says you are guilty and raped Higgins.
Hang on, the court was there to rule if he was defamed or not, it was not to determine if he was guilty or not. He was not on trial for rape.
Can someone here please help me?

 

[Kaz]

He wasn't found not guilty.

His ACT Supreme Court criminal trial for Higgins' sexual assault was aborted in 2022 owing to juror misconduct.

 

[Northern Beaches dog]

He wasn't found not guilty.

hHs ACT Supreme Court criminal trial for Higgins' sexual assault was aborted in 2022 owing to juror misconduct.

Oh ok, so he was neither guilty or not guilty. That was the purpose of the trial.

The purpose of this trial was to determine if he was defamed or not? Not if he raped Higgins or not....correct?

 

[Haslerhasworms]

Oh ok, so he was neither guilty or not guilty. That was the purpose of the trial.

The purpose of this trial was to determine if he was defamed or not? Not if he raped Higgins or not....correct?

Why are you framing your questions like a judge?

Or is that the joke?

I'm confused.