Was the Fix on? (Clear agenda)

Papa Joe

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
2,458
Reaction score
5,757
Can someone please enlighten me on the correct ruling from the Foxx's first no try?

I thought that after he knocked on he actually attempted to kick the ball rather than the ball just hit his foot.

I thought the rule was that he needed to make an attempt to kick in order to play on..... but I could be wrong.
 

belmore_utd

Pro Golf Hack
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
7,281
Reaction score
7,802
I'm still confused as to who the people in green jerseys we're in the bulldogs vs ben cummins game
 

BondiBulldog

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
1,259
Reaction score
1,398
Can someone please enlighten me on the correct ruling from the Foxx's first no try?

I thought that after he knocked on he actually attempted to kick the ball rather than the ball just hit his foot.

I thought the rule was that he needed to make an attempt to kick in order to play on..... but I could be wrong.
You need to intentionally kick the ball.. he clearly dropped it and as a last ditch attempt to avoid the knock on put boot to ball- it’s a knock on.
 

Papa Joe

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
2,458
Reaction score
5,757
You need to intentionally kick the ball.. he clearly dropped it and as a last ditch attempt to avoid the knock on put boot to ball- it’s a knock on.
Unless it's Billy Slater in Storm colours, who by the way actually got away with the ball touching the ground first and they ruled that it was an attempted drop kick.... a metre out of the ingoal, who then scored a try.
 

Kempsey Dog

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
SC Top Scorer
Tipping Champion
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
24,069
Reaction score
25,696
Can someone please enlighten me on the correct ruling from the Foxx's first no try?

I thought that after he knocked on he actually attempted to kick the ball rather than the ball just hit his foot.

I thought the rule was that he needed to make an attempt to kick in order to play on..... but I could be wrong.
Try to Billy Slater years ago... No try for everyone else ever since lol
 

LordSidious66

Kennel Legend
Joined
Jul 30, 2011
Messages
9,640
Reaction score
6,613
He says in a thread about 3 correct decisions being proof of games being ‘fixed’ against us
Look I am going to be the adult here and agree to disagree with you without resorting to childish insults. Have a nice day.
 

Philmus

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
May 3, 2021
Messages
3,473
Reaction score
6,151
Can someone please enlighten me on the correct ruling from the Foxx's first no try?

I thought that after he knocked on he actually attempted to kick the ball rather than the ball just hit his foot.

I thought the rule was that he needed to make an attempt to kick in order to play on..... but I could be wrong.
the fact he ran and finished the play off by scoring after the whistle was blown a few times showed that JAC knew it was going to be a try and that he made an attempt to kick it, and then the fact we werent allowed to challenge it (probably because it wouldve been called a try) was an absolute joke. 'your 10 seconds is up' is ludicrous. why not just send it up as a no try/allow the challenge if the ref was so confident?
 

Malla

*********
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Messages
10,870
Reaction score
13,470
Only person that fixed anything was probably Naden having money on Raiders
Inept dog of a flop
 

Bazildog

Kennel Legend
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
20,821
I hear that Isaac is hearing that there was a secret memo sent out to all referee's and linesman/woman/genderfluid and video refs that stated a mandatory 5-6 penaltys per game must be awarded against Canterbury. Cash bonus's will be paid to officials that come up with creative reasons for sin binnings and send offs.

Definetely not a conspiracy..
 

Papa Joe

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
2,458
Reaction score
5,757
the fact he ran and finished the play off by scoring after the whistle was blown a few times showed that JAC knew it was going to be a try and that he made an attempt to kick it, and then the fact we werent allowed to challenge it (probably because it wouldve been called a try) was an absolute joke. 'your 10 seconds is up' is ludicrous. why not just send it up as a no try/allow the challenge if the ref was so confident?
Because it was us, and Because the Raiders needed to win on their 40th anniversary night in front of all their old boys.... that's all I got.
 

MitchNewton

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Messages
1,040
Reaction score
987
Rapana done 2 foul plays and still didnt get sin binned... shoulder to the head and impeding Jac without the ball in a try scoring opportunity... and you still think there isnt an agenda
3 challenges won in a row
dufty impeded by croker denying a certain try
jac try denied by a comical obstruction call
Jac runaway try denied after Cummins claimed he knocked on but he kicked the ball before it hit the ground and refused the challenge when we asked for it

This thread is not about our own game so keep it relevant
If there was fix then we would of not won any of our challenges as they were 50/50 at best
 

mez

Kennel Participant
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Messages
249
Reaction score
272
I hear that Isaac is hearing that there was a secret memo sent out to all referee's and linesman/woman/genderfluid and video refs that stated a mandatory 5-6 penaltys per game must be awarded against Canterbury. Cash bonus's will be paid to officials that come up with creative reasons for sin binnings and send offs.

Definetely not a conspiracy..
Sounds legit
 
Top