Exactly write...very good pointI reckon everyone’s thoughts would change if it was Burton who didn’t want the vax
Exactly write...very good pointI reckon everyone’s thoughts would change if it was Burton who didn’t want the vax
Yep but the players who are unvaxxed have a much greater chance of catching it so the NRL could hold them financially responsible for any delays. Could be just a scare tactic though.So hard to prove where infection came from tho so that's a slippery slope of blame?
As someone said....every team will probably have several players get it as it spreads thru the population....unvaxxed will get worse symptoms/infection I guess.
Top 30 will need to be Top 40.
I didnt say replace him you did , but seeing as you asked we might be able to lure Kikau overLet Thompson go and replace him with who? I want to see how he goes with better players around him
The Bulldogs are his employer,its like you refusing a drug test at your work what would happen then?To call someone an imbecile because they dont want to get tge vac is being ignorant..has the NRL come out and said players must get vacced? Unless that happens he has a choice to do what he wants
We have TPJ and don't need another strike second rower. Vaughan has a 1 year contract and if Thompson was moved on we'd desperately need a quality prop. Maybe if TPJ played middle it'd work but Kikau's price tag's going to be huge and we all know we need to spend in the spine.I didnt say replace him you did , but seeing as you asked we might be able to lure Kikau over
Very good with the ball.Thompson is a good player. However he also gets suspended a lot and is expensive. So I'm not crying if they move him on.
While NSW hasn't said it mandatory for the sports industry but it is mandatory to enter the stadiums so how can he play next year.As of right now no unvaccinated player will be playing in Melbourne by Vic government regulations. So I don’t know how that works for The NRL if they’re not gonna policy on it. And what happens if QLD and NSW follow?
Are clubs expected to pay players who can’t play because of “personal choice”?
Too inaccurate.Rapid antigen testing is the solution
You’d also have some people saying “surely we can make an exemption for Burton”…..only because it’s Burton lolYes... in so much as more fans upset and more disappointed.
I just can't see them going after individual players tho. It would be so hard to prove and get kicked out of court.Yep but the players who are unvaxxed have a much greater chance of catching it so the NRL could hold them financially responsible for any delays. Could be just a scare tactic though.
I had a mate who got it despite being double vaxxed because his child caught it.
The NRL will have to set up guidelines for it. This will be a NRL problem not a Bulldog one.If he refuses and no club will take him due to new rules, we’re fucked I’d say. We’d have to pay contract out in full.
Thats true but at the drop of a hat, we may have targetted lockdowns or mandatory 2 doses IF this gets out of control OR to a level that the pollies know that the population will not accept a lot of overloaded hospitals or deaths. Dont forget the upcoming electionAfter Dec 1 I dont see any restriction apart from interstate travel - according to the Roadmap the Public Health Order requiring proof of vaccination ends.