I'm gonna bang on once again about the Fox Effect ....coming to a regional town near you
.....anyone who thinks it's fanciful or not a planned Murdoch strategy, please don't concern yourself with reading this article from Crikey...you'll think it's left wing radical commo press.
hydrochloride and other good things for us. This is how these bigots start their divisive work in communities. People actually fall for it
As regional areas lose more and more of their local news, Sky has gained an increasingly receptive audience.
www.crikey.com.au
“They’ve also begun talking about topics that seem to be brought up only by the show’s hosts.”
- Yeah and? who else would bring them up if not the hosts? it’s not uncommon to bring up a discussion from a show you’ve seen the night before. In fact it happens regularly.
“Last year she began using Sky News as her major source of information as she became more and more sceptical of public health measures.”
- Yeah so she looked at the anomalies and mixed messaging from govt and decided to use a different source of perspective.
“Ken doesn’t blame Sky entirely for his friend’s views”
-That’s incredibly big of Ken isn’t it? I’m certain Kens friend has the option and the right to hold a different perspective without having to find something to blame for it.
“Against the backdrop of a regional Australia that has less and less local media, it’s gaining a foothold as an increasingly popular source of hyper-partisan information and misinformation for those who live in country Australia.”
is it popular because they live in the country? or is it just popular. Or is it that the author is creating the illusion that country folk have nothing better to do than listen to conspiracy theories by people who literally are or have been in all current popular forums of the Australian media?
“The disproved treatment has been a popular topic of discussion by COVID health restrictions sceptics and anti-vaxxers alike”
- lol ah..what the fuck does a disproved treatment for covid have to do with people who for whatever reason choose not to vaccinate against it? It was obviously a popular topic for a lot of people at some point otherwise all the studies wouldn’t have been done around it.Just sounds like a convenient way for the author to throw in “antivaxxer” to appeal to all the warm frogs.
Basically the whole article is a piece of tripe. Left wing BS.Biased.Agenda driven crap.