The rainbow is back!

[Scoooby]

Need i say more. Lol

No not at all lol, at least you now have 20 of them

 

[Realist90]

You said, "who says it's OK to be gay though?"

As in, being gay is what a gay person is. Having homosexual sex is what is considered sin.

So there's a difference. If you hate someone having homosexual sex... Eh. That's your religion. That's fine.

If you hate someone for being gay..
Yeah, that's bigotry.

Hating gay isn’t hating the person no need to try and do some fantabulous extravagant mental gymnastic manoeuvres

 

[Mr 95%]

Yep. Like, literally the research I just posted. But it's funny as it was sold 2 different ways. The right wing media sold it as, "no gay gene, being gay is a choice". The research was actually much different
It said that it found that no single gay gene exists but a combination of different genes are related to being gay.

Just a side note..I don’t know how anyone could think being gay is a choice.. Because if that was true I wonder why there were still homosexuals in NAZI Germany..because that was an instant march to a nearby concentration camp.. Sheesh you’d think there would be no gay people.. Anyway just an observation..

 

[Hacky McAxe]

But that doesn’t prove there’s an actual gay gene lol. Come on bro you can’t handle one or two articles from right wing media? You guys literally are 99%of media. I’m sure you will cope with a women exercising her right to an opinion like mirander Devine. You should be supportive of all whamans no matter their opinion tbh, because it means they have that freedom and you shouldn’t mansplain them down. It shows a lack of feminism in your ideology

I keep forgetting that any left of you is considered "left wing"

 

[Hacky McAxe]

Hating gay isn’t hating the person no need to try and do some fantabulous extravagant mental gymnastic manoeuvres

No mental gymnastics. Being gay is what they are. Hence why hating gay people is bigotry.

 

[Realist90]

No mental gymnastics. Being gay is what they are. Hence why hating gay people is bigotry.

But that only applies if the gay gene is real. Which we’ve concluded it isn’t real by science.

 

[Hacky McAxe]

I know the existence of gay people scares you but it's OK. Existence of the Catholic Church scares people but they accept it. Because it's a free country we live in where we accept people for who they are.

 

[Realist90]

@Hacky McAxe
Decent article. Website even has science in it.

https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www.livescience.com/amp/no-single-gene-makes-someone-gay.html

 

[Hacky McAxe]

But that only applies if the gay gene is real. Which we’ve concluded it isn’t real by science.

Nah. Difference. It only applies if being gay is not a choice. And it's not a choice.

 

[Realist90]

I know the existence of gay people scares you but it's OK. Existence of the Catholic Church scares people but they accept it. Because it's a free country we live in where we accept people for who they are.

Lmfao they accept it? They’re still trying to for e the church to change its views on gayism. Don’t give me a fake story please.

 

[Mr Beast]

lol Just keep in the back of your minds. It’s just an emoji reaction A rainbow. Nothing more, nothing less.

 

[Mr Beast]

I feel like I’m at the Mardi Gras with the amount of rainbows in this thread.

 

[Hacky McAxe]

@Hacky McAxe
Decent article. Website even has science in it.

https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www.livescience.com/amp/no-single-gene-makes-someone-gay.html

Yep. It references the study I linked. And the sub-title is:

"But collectively, genes do play a role in sexual orientation"

Did you read the article?

 

[Realist90]

Yep. It references the study I linked. And the sub-title is:

"But collectively, genes do play a role in sexual orientation"

Did you read the article?

Collectively does not mean there is a specific gay gene. Do you understand the article?

 

[Hacky McAxe]

Collectively does not mean there is a specific gay gene. Do you understand the article?

When did I say there was a single gay gene?

Do you even read my posts, bro?

 

[Hacky McAxe]

Yep. Like, literally the research I just posted. But it's funny as it was sold 2 different ways. The right wing media sold it as, "no gay gene, being gay is a choice". The research was actually much different
It said that it found that no single gay gene exists but a combination of different genes are related to being gay.

I feel I need to quote myself so you can read it again.

 

[Realist90]

When did I say there was a single gay gene?

Do you even read my posts, bro?

Yes but I read your subliminal meanings as well. You’re clearly trying to say without saying that the gay gene is real. I see what you can’t see

 

[Hacky McAxe]

Yes but I read your subliminal meanings as well. You’re clearly trying to say without saying that the gay gene is real. I see what you can’t see

So when I said that the gay gene isn't real you interpret that as "the gay gene is real"

I'm starting to understand where your comprehension problems stem from.

 

[Realist90]

So when I said that the gay gene isn't real you interpret that as "the gay gene is real"

I'm starting to understand where your comprehension problems stem from.

Wait. Did I not just say the gay gene isn’t real, then you corrected me saying collectively they migrate illegally into a gay gene yet not a single gene?

 

[Hacky McAxe]

Wait. Did I not just say the gay gene isn’t real, then you corrected me saying collectively they migrate illegally into a gay gene yet not a single gene?

You argued that I said or suggested that the gay gene is real. Even though I didn't suggest or say that. That's what I corrected you on.