Rumour Roosters set to make play for Bulldogs gun

[CaptainJackson]

Even if we have to pay 300k, send him

At least it's 200k off our books

 

[JUNKYARD DOGS]

You won’t

 

[oldpuppy]

We owe the Roosters a prank or two. Gave us Napa and Flanno. We give them the S.O.O gun Allan.

 

[chemdog]

Even if we have to pay 300k, send him

At least it's 200k off our books

not necessarily cause we still have to pay someone minimum wage to replace him so technically we only save around 100k or even less

 

[Bulldogsteve]

not necessarily cause we still have to pay someone minimum wage to replace him so technically we only save around 100k or even less

we have have to shed players to get under the 30, we dont need to replace him

 

[The DoggFather]

I'd rather a Nerf gun, more powerful

 

[CaptainJackson]

not necessarily cause we still have to pay someone minimum wage to replace him so technically we only save around 100k or even less

There you go Bulldogsteve said we have to shed players, so whatever we save on Allan, we can frontload payment for someone in our top 30

 

[chemdog]

we have have to shed players to get under the 30, we dont need to replace him

well we only have 27 -28 players contracted so far for next season for top 30

 

[Bulldogsteve]

well we only have 27 -28 players contracted so far for next season for top 30

no we dont we have our roster filled and we need to offload some

 

[Cujo]

Even if we have to pay 300k, send him

At least it's 200k off our books

He would have to be replaced by someone on at least $120, not sure it’s worth doing for $80k, particularly if it helps the cocks!!
If we paid $100-150 it would definitely be worth it

 

[Dogzzz of War]

no we dont we have our roster filled and we need to offload some

Allen is contracted for next , so our saving will be whatever comes off our books less a minimum wage player.

 

[CaptainJackson]

He would have to be replaced by someone on at least $120, not sure it’s worth doing for $80k, particularly if it helps the cocks!!
If we paid $100-150 it would definitely be worth it

He's always injured, so even if we a minimum wage $120k player, at least we have a player available to be picked from

and

$80k is $80k, if we were to save $80k on 3 players that $240k. Every little bit helps

 

[Aristidiz]

We have loads of young backs with way more potential than this flog, let him go if they pay at least $250k for him. We need that money for other positions such as 7

 

[Marki]

Unless the chooks pay 300k of the 500k, we may as well keep him. At the end of the day, if he is called up to first grade, we know he can at least hold his own.

If we had our eyes set on a "must have" player, then that changes things but otherwise its not worth saving 80-100k and strengthening the Roosters depth

 

[Phalangist]

Please take him off our hands, and stop calling them the tri-colours they ain't the only club with 3 colours ffs.

That’s so true lol

 

[Phalangist]

No way.
We’ve not seen the best of him. Give him some time with Cam. If nothing happening in a few months, call it then. Last time we gave someone away to a well coached club….aka Nick Meaney….. we found we’d let go a quality first grader. Plus, and more importantly, I would never want to give Roosters anything / anyone they wanted ever!

meaney is shit lol

 

[Cappuccino]

Oh no
Hoping he doesn't take Okonbor, Jackson and Waddell with him!

 

[Raikkonen]

If he does go, this will be as pleasing as seeing Naden go without finishing a season

 

[surfdog]

no we dont we have our roster filled and we need to offload some

Why would we have every spot filled at this point ? Seems strange not to have some.room to move for next year

 

[Bulldogsteve]

Why would we have every spot filled at this point ? Seems strange not to have some.room to move for next year

thats why you move players on