Why dodge lol. You’re the one with the standard of “animals do it so it’s natural and ok”.
I did. Apparently it's the Rohingya people of Myanmar. They're Muslim Btw.
You're the one dodging. I said that it's not unnatural because animals do it. You said that animals rape and murder and asked if that's natural. I pointed out that it is. Then you changed it from natural to what's acceptable.
I didn't say you were a bigot. I just think you're strong beliefs are extreme and want to debate them.
You talking about the people’s crusade? Which the church condemned at the time and later on? I mentioned this many times to you before that it was wrong what they did but to bundle the people’s crusade into the same basket as the actual crusade authorised by the church is reckless history to propagate a anti catholic narrative which you’re doing to a t.
I'm just saying that the Jewish people were more persecuted than Christians throughout history.
Yeh i don't know what the copy paste had to do with the discussion you were having...
Did you read his comment lol. It was to show that he was putting the people’s crusade into the same basket as the actual crusaders on the churches authority. It’s reckless “history” with generalising it. Because people like you and others will be like oh crusaders were evillllll reeeeeeeeeee. Because you haven’t been educated properly on the topic. Do you see how bad actual misinformation is?
So wait. Your saying jews weren't killed for being jews (persecuted) by catholics in the peoples crusade?
I still don’t get how Protestants believe in the Bible but don’t believe in the church who actually selected the books in the Bible. Like seriously, how can they not see that!
I think you either missed the point or playing twister again
Brother it’s a ridiculous paradox. I mean the fact that their father in Martin Luther wanted to take out books from even the New Testament in the book of revelations, book of James etc coz they went against his individual interpretations should’ve been alarming enough, to which many of his actual supporters did argue with him about it and eventually gave in leaving the books in but took out many from the Old Testament due to going against his personal interpretations. Have you ever read about st ignatious of Antioch? The guy flat out references “catholic” he was a disciple of the apostles of Christ bro. Real guy as well that history can back up. That’s what’s great about Catholicism, not only do we have faith but we’re blessed with actual recorded history to prove the accounts of real people who lived
Twister bro
Yep, dodges, swerves, twists, he’s got all the bag of tricks.
You’re not asking the original question based on the “realist never thought the church did wrong” then references the people’s crusade to attack the church. So to answer that original question, the church did not authorise such attacks but condemned, my stance has always been aligned to the church, not random people who were Christian and committed those acts. The church rightfully condemned them at the time and always has throughout history.
I sometimes think we’re on twitter here bro honest to Darwin.
Nah, that's what Realist was doing.
Yeah bro. St Ignatious of Antioch.
Where did I reference the people's crusade to attach the church?