- Joined
- May 7, 2011
- Messages
- 37,291
- Reaction score
- 30,015
Yep. In this case I would say that the context is the most relevant part. Mr T said the usual, "oh ye of little faith" in response to me calling Abrahamic religion apocalypse ideas "mythology"So if we talk about faith as in psychologically functional thought in the face of objective uncertainty, we have can have a conversation? I will agree that much of what religious people call faith is more akin to superstition, a blind deluded thought process. However I would also suggest that those who try to hold claim to a level of objectivity that makes them immune to any need to function with the use of subjective certainty also have a blind deluded thought process.
So we could go through every definition or concept of faith, but most would not be relevant to the conversation and would obviously not be what we were talking about.
So instead we go into it being religious faith (as the point of discussion) then look at the dictionary definition of that as seen in definition #2: