if they come out and say that some people may understand and give them further time.
Others may say it is a ploy for re-election. Reality is from 1 November we could be signing players for 22 if we wanted to.
As a successful club we’ve been lingering down the bottom for a while. There was a certain way this board went about the rebuild, there could have been other ways to do it in a different or quicker timeframe.
Could we have signed players for this year if things were structured differently? Were players like Stimson, Britt and Katoa the best use of limited funds and who made the decision to sign those players. All interesting points which we’ll probably not know answers to.
Think there's absolutely no doubt the board could've done things better. Agree about some / most of the signings we've made being questionable as to whether they were best use of the limited funds. The board made some mistakes, and I'm certainly not here to blow smoke up their arses.
But ...
I'll ask the question. Why is NOW the time to do this?
The reality is that this push to oust this board is directly after the season has finished, and before we're able to finalise our roster for '21. Why is that? As you say, if we were to make some good signings for '21 or even '22 I think people will be more positive and believe in the vision of the club a little more. Which is why this faction is stirring up shit now before any positive news can come out from the club.
If this faction truly cared about the club they'd at least wait till Barrett had got his signings in, as Barrett will be our coach next year. Will changing 3 positions really make it easier to be better on the field next year? Doubt it.
I get what you're saying though and can see you're not seeing this side or that which I respect.