It can only get better can't it? It sure can't get any worse. We have 15 players off contract and between $2-3 million to spend to get a hooker and some forwards.No I’m not arguing for the sake of it. My point was, in response to you saying it’s better he didn’t come now to play behind this shitty pack. Whether he came now or next year would be no different. I don’t see the pack being much different next season
And Klemmer to Knights for nothingYou know what’s funny... how we handed a dally m medalist to the broncos for nothing ahahahhaha
i still can’t believe that to this day
Exactly. I certainly hope they don’t overlook the weaknesses in our forward pack whilst targeting strike backsIt can only get better can't it? It sure can't get any worse. We have 15 players off contract and between $2-3 million to spend to get a hooker and some forwards.
Obviously there's no guarantee that we sign the players we need to make a difference, but the opportunity is there if they spend the cap space well.
They were targeting Leniu and Piakura which is encouraging. As long as we don't sign more rejects like Hetherington and Waddell then we'll be okay.
The Titans have shown the importance of signing impact forwards. Fifita and Tino have made a huge impact to go along with Moeaki, Lisone, Wallace, Joliffe etc.Exactly. I certainly hope they don’t overlook the weaknesses in our forward pack whilst targeting strike backs
And hanant to the broncos for 1500 tickets, reimis to the storm for nothing and Harper to manly for nothing. We are the club that gets nothing.And Klemmer to Knights for nothing
I wonder how long until TK complaints start about Khoury’s leadership . Hill was a good operator - still don’t get why he was cut but Khoury wanted Dib as CEO so likely something to do with that. Happy to give Wharby a chance of course. Guess you can never please everyone and it’s a political and ego minefield.You start to wonder whether the new CEO/Chairman combo know what they're doing. Losing Andrew Hill could be more significant than people think.
No politics at all Dinkum. Just what's best for the club. You know that much with me. Maybe it's more of a Hill/Warburton thing. Hill did a good job and I still don't know exactly why he left. Warburton had no Rugby League background unlike Hill and that was always a concern for me.I wonder how long until TK complaints start about Khoury’s leadership . Hill was a good operator - still don’t get why he was cut but Khoury wanted Dib as CEO so likely something to do with that. Happy to give Wharby a chance of course. Guess you can never please everyone and it’s a political and ego minefield.
Because there’s a policy to not to pay players to play elsewhere which bit us in 2018/19. We’re also thin on forwards so it looked different 8 weeks ago. Guess they were willing to bend that rule after the poor season start - similar to allowing a PO for Burton otherwise he wouldn’t have signed. Amazing what you’re willing to do when things aren’t going your way.Okay, so why did the club change their mind (because they got the decision wrong)? I would of payed all of Napa's salary to play elsewhere if it was the only way to get the deal done.
I wasn’t suggesting it’s political for you mate, I was saying the club is a political minefield. Hill survived 3 (well, 2.5) Chairs in 3 years. I know his contract was up but I don’t think that’s all there was to it. I’ve heard things but unconfirmed so won’t speculate.No politics at all Dinkum. Just what's best for the club. You know that much with me. Maybe it's more of a Hill/Warburton thing. Hill did a good job and I still don't know exactly why he left. Warburton had no Rugby League background unlike Hill and that was always a concern for me.
But the way this Burton saga has unfolded is amateur hour and embarrassing for the club. They need to let it go and let him focus on this season. All this back and forth does is make the club look bad, make it unfair on Averillo and Flanagan and put too much pressure on Burton.
Yeah there's definitely more to Hill moving on than they've let on. Which is worrying in itself as just when you think we're finally past the political nonsense, it lurks yet again. Even the mention of Dib a few months ago was enough to send shivers down our spines. The way Laundy carries on bugs me also.I wasn’t suggesting it’s political for you mate, I was saying the club is a political minefield. Hill survived 3 (well, 2.5) Chairs in 3 years. I know his contract was up but I don’t think that’s all there was to it. I’ve heard things but unconfirmed so won’t speculate.
Yes they need to let the Burton thing go. Promoting Ava to the 30 may be one step in that. The final spot should only be for any decent 8, 9 or 10 that may become available by then (keeping in mind Thommo’s forthcoming return).
Is there a vaccine for the NRL-21 virus?? .Yeah there's definitely more to Hill moving on than they've let on. Which is worrying in itself as just when you think we're finally past the political nonsense, it lurks yet again. Even the mention of Dib a few months ago was enough to send shivers down our spines. The way Laundy carries on bugs me also.
Anyway, I'm optimistic solely because of Burton as I think we were lucky enough to sign a genuine top five half in the comp. Without that good news, it would be impossible to try and get through another lost season.
You serious.... you want to talk about fair klemmer barba mason sbw hannant RsmithNo politics at all Dinkum. Just what's best for the club. You know that much with me. Maybe it's more of a Hill/Warburton thing. Hill did a good job and I still don't know exactly why he left. Warburton had no Rugby League background unlike Hill and that was always a concern for me.
But the way this Burton saga has unfolded is amateur hour and embarrassing for the club. They need to let it go and let him focus on this season. All this back and forth does is make the club look bad, make it unfair on Averillo and Flanagan and put too much pressure on Burton.