1/1/20-30/6/21 (72 weeks)we had
~30,000 cases
~12 weeks of lockdowns masks etc
1/7/21-Now (26 weeks) we've had
~300,000 cases
26 weeks of lockdowns masks etc
There is a positive correlation between lockdowns and cases. Looking at those rough numbers I suspect that making people wear masks is not effective at stopping new cases. That clear?
That is somewhat clearer.
But it still makes no sense unless you're ignoring vaccination, social distancing, and many other factors. But that's why scientific research is important. It means that people can use the correct methodology rather than reading stuff on the internet and making uneducated guesses.
You weren't understanding my point. The govt is not releasing data on cases or deaths by vax status, unlike the Canada data I posted earlier.
I can't even believe you posted the rest, there goes the benefit of the doubt I usually give you. You are very intellectually dishonest. You know they repeat those numbers on the news and in the paper every day, yeah? You know that its also on the dept of health pages where I look up all of the case numbers/deaths, right?
How can I take anything you say seriously whenyou quote a post of mine in which I quote mr95's infographic that includes vax numbers and then an hour later accuse me of veing ignorant of the vax%? You think I know the number of death, number of cases but "durr im too dern stoopid to look up the dern vax numberrs derp" I mean thats a massive failure of your inference abilities... or you were just being dishonest. Dishonest or dumb, either way.
Still sounding like a drunken child. At least take a second to fix your grammatical and spelling errors. I'm not trying to be a grammar nazi but it's extremely confusing to read when it feels like you leave words out.
Back on topic, I understood your point that the government isn't giving you the exact figures you're looking for. They often provide vaccination status and scientific research provides vaccination status, but the government doesn't provide vaccination status for all cases.
All that said, you made a massively broad assumption (that no one is vaccinated) just because you didn't have all the data. That's not even extrapolation. That's extreme cognitive bias.
It's basically like me saying, "The Bulldogs dominated this year! They scored heaps of points and the NRL didn't provide sufficient proof that the other teams exist so I'm ignoring all their points and saying that the Bulldogs won the premiership!"
It's a great win for ignorance, but it's very poor science.
No I don't wonder. Where did you get the idea that I was confused? I understand that the mods are gay and get cry face when naughty words get used. Hey, hackymcvax, if you read back you'll see that doogie was name calling first, but you dont care about honesty, you care about circle jerking and me not being mean to your soggy sao team mates.
Your problem is that someone posts banter and your response is to basically unload with a barrage of insults that are way beyond the argument. It's like you have no understanding the basics of debate etiquette.
Mr 95% posted something, you responded in debate. Doogie called you a conspiracy theorist, you exploded into calling him a retard. When he replied you started on about fucking his mother.
Any time someone debates or criticises you, you blow up in an absolute schoolyard tantrum like a kid with no self control.
I get it. You're a guy who hates people and wants to attack everyone. Every conversation I have seen you have amplifies the fact that you're a young Australian who thinks white people are oppressed, hates gay people, and wants to abuse anyone who thinks differently.
Even while I point out that you keep getting yourself banned, your immediate reaction is to call the moderators "gay". Literally jumping to homophobia even though the forum rules say that this is cause for ban.
Maybe just don't be an angry kid and enjoy the forum. If you don't enjoy it, that's cool. Piss off to Tiktok or some other place that makes you feel special.
