- Joined
- Mar 24, 2019
- Messages
- 15,970
- Reaction score
- 19,227
Our attack sucks because we have a winger playing fullback. A fullback playing wing. Not a good enough winger playing on the other wing. A centre that's more assist orientated. Another centre who's a winger (before the move we barely had a centre playing centre anyways). Inexperienced halves due to our best half being injured 1/3 of the time. Props that offer nothing in attack, one can barely pass a ball and they're both slow as shiz. A manufactured hooker that has faults in almost every area except speed (which he barely uses). One solid second rower that offers very little in attack. Our attacking minded second rower just got the sack so we're going to have to use a second rower that struggled to play there one year ago, who we're possibly not even going to re-sign (or are we going to play that second rower who just got dropped and has been horrible since we signed him?). The lock that everyone hates that's probably our best attacking option in our forward pack. Is that not what you see?Mate I hear what you are saying, but at the end of the day the buck stops with the coach.
The game plan was also shit, it’s very defense oriented and out d was not up to the attack from the lowly Cowboys.
Just to add to this we have maybe one to three players (two of them pretty debatable) that are in the top half of the competition in their position.
The Cowboys roster is much better than ours. It's amazing what an extra 2-3m lets you do to a team isn't it.
Last edited: