- Joined
- Sep 2, 2012
- Messages
- 107,881
- Reaction score
- 120,587
All these haters going to get their wish when the Rami Malik guy is out of business
All these haters going to get their wish when the Rami Malik guy is out of business
yeah, or the broncos..if any of the protected clubs want him they will get himProbably already received a hand shake from Uncle Nick.
This is assuming Greenberg and/or the NRL in its existing form goes, yes?yeah, or the broncos..if any of the protected clubs want him they will get him
Don't know what you're taking about robots I'm talking the Rashays guyNo idea who you're talking about, but Rami Malek is amazing in Mr Robot..
But if that were the case - wouldn't the NRL have specified that CHN 'wasn't eligible to play again in 2020' or 'has been deregistered for 2020'?CHN's redemption process will be what determines if he comes back in 2021 and plays for us. If he says and does all the right things then there is I can't see any reason why he won't be re registered by the NRL for the 2021 Season. His redemption needs to be very carefully managed, owing up to his mistake, apologising for his transgression to everyone, especially his family, his teammates and us fans. He needs to recruit a full service communications agency that specialises in redemption stories and let them manage his comeback, step by step. They need to align with our spin doctors, shyte, do we even have any?
Go Dogs
They can always apply for re-registration. Probably out of the question for this year, but next year things might be a little bit different and at least these guys can get their careers back on the track with the some interstate clubs.But if that were the case - wouldn't the NRL have specified that CHN 'wasn't eligible to play again in 2020' or 'has been deregistered for 2020'?
They said de-registered, full stop. The only other case I can think of as a precedent in recent times is Barba, or perhaps the Bubbler - so maybe CHN can play in England unless otherwise specified (though with the Rona, that might be complicated / less attractive too).
Guess we have to wait and see what the fallout for the rest of the year is competition wise, whether Greenberg survives (but really shouldn't be a factor) and how NRL 2021 might look as well.They can always apply for re-registration. Probably out of the question for this year, but next year things might be a little bit different and at least these guys can get their careers back on the track with the some interstate clubs.
Nah fuck that, he needs to somehow become legible for overseas clubs again then go fucking scorched earth on Todd and the NRL.CHN's redemption process will be what determines if he comes back in 2021 and plays for us. If he says and does all the right things then there is I can't see any reason why he won't be re registered by the NRL for the 2021 Season. His redemption needs to be very carefully managed, owing up to his mistake, apologising for his transgression to everyone, especially his family, his teammates and us fans. He needs to recruit a full service communications agency that specialises in redemption stories and let them manage his comeback, step by step. They need to align with our spin doctors, shyte, do we even have any?
Go Dogs
Does make you wonder what actually to fuck happened here. Clearly both the club and NRL not only morally feel he shouldn't be playing league again, but also legally. It's actually a very very big call so there must be a fair bit we don't know about this story.But if that were the case - wouldn't the NRL have specified that CHN 'wasn't eligible to play again in 2020' or 'has been deregistered for 2020'?
They said de-registered, full stop. The only other case I can think of as a precedent in recent times is Barba, or perhaps the Bubbler - so maybe CHN can play in England unless otherwise specified (though with the Rona, that might be complicated / less attractive too).
Was expecting some of that redemption to have started already tho. Guess club is gagging them which is smart ... from our sidwCHN's redemption process will be what determines if he comes back in 2021 and plays for us. If he says and does all the right things then there is I can't see any reason why he won't be re registered by the NRL for the 2021 Season. His redemption needs to be very carefully managed, owing up to his mistake, apologising for his transgression to everyone, especially his family, his teammates and us fans. He needs to recruit a full service communications agency that specialises in redemption stories and let them manage his comeback, step by step. They need to align with our spin doctors, shyte, do we even have any?
Go Dogs
I think it’s highly probable that there’s information that hasn’t been publicly released - if you refer to the statement from the club, they said: ‘The consequences of this matter have been serious and far reaching‘ and ‘We know and accept that there will be conflicting views about the penalties’.Does make you wonder what actually to fuck happened here. Clearly both the club and NRL not only morally feel he shouldn't be playing league again, but also legally. It's actually a very very big call so there must be a fair bit we don't know about this story.
Personally I don't care where he goes. Wish him all the best and all of that but he's no longer a Bulldog so ... Ciao
yeah def my thinking also. Im a lawyer also, didnt study employment law but it does have meritsCorey will win. Ive spoken to a lawyer friend and he has said that its unfair dismissal. When you put his case against the other players allowed to play it looks good for him.
The fact the club has also had another play charged* by police for a offence and was was allowed to play it not good either.
Cockinballs is in trouble. His matter is black and white. I agree he should have been punished but Corey nothing more than a fine and a few games out of action.
yeah def my thinking also. Im a lawyer also, didnt study employment law but it does have merits
Possible I guess?Frankly, I don't see why CHN doesn't sue the NRL and the club.
In the meantime, while he is suing he can apply for re-registration in a bid to mitigate his loss. More than likely the NRL will buckle and permit him to be re-registered and a club will pick him up on the cheap. He will sue the club for the difference, and the club will roll over and settle like it did with Hasler. Unless I am missing something?
You have to be careful when talking about legal advice with the kennel. You'll get all sorts of fair dinkum cereal box advice.Frankly, I don't see why CHN doesn't sue the NRL and the club.
In the meantime, while he is suing he can apply for re-registration in a bid to mitigate his loss. More than likely the NRL will buckle and permit him to be re-registered and a club will pick him up on the cheap. He will sue the club for the difference, and the club will roll over and settle like it did with Hasler. Unless I am missing something?
Haha you're not wrong about some of the fair dinkum advice people give on here think I've given my share of fair dinkum tips with most of it being rubbish!You have to be careful when talking about legal advice with the kennel. You'll get all sorts of fair dinkum cereal box advice.
that said, yes, CHN might get a favourable verdict.
When it comes to legalese, it's not always about who's wrong or right. It actually rarely is. It's about being free of a drawn out legal case.
worst thing about the western legal system is obstruction tactics is too easy. Lawyers love it. They win out, but it's a burden of everyone else.
Muts why RA paid out Folau despite
Their own confidence and why we settled wit Hasler.
CHN gets half his contract and tops it up plus more with a Cronulla (for example) contract and comes out ahead.
then he plays against us, fired up and put Mariner of someone in hospital.
we haven't handled it well. We can't think forward.
but this is my gripe with that logic, who does that win over exactly?Haha you're not wrong about some of the fair dinkum advice people give on here think I've given my share of fair dinkum tips with most of it being rubbish!
Agree about it being hard seeing CHN play against us, however we need to see the bigger picture and realise why the club made this decision. It wasn't about the player but the values and culture of the club. No player or person is bigger than the club and all.od that ...
Well ... this is perhaps where you're making a mistake like it seems many on here.but this is my gripe with that logic, who does that win over exactly?
When you appease the do gooder crowd, you don't win over supporters and win favours. You don't get anything + EV.
You do however get your own players and fans (family) annoyed.
it's your own fans you need to satisfy. They are the ones you stand to lose.
As you saw, the sponsor went regardless.
this same reason, I don't get why RA was so quick to appease the LGBT crowd in the Israel saga.
I'm sure there are some, but I have never got the feeling that gay people are passionate rugby fans. I DO get the feeling that Christian's and poly islanders are.
So who wins when you come down hard on Izzy?
The players and Christians who support are unhappy and don't buy tickets
The team results likely suffer. Removing your best players.
The gays? They nod their head, Thankyou for your support then go off back to their fashion, music and dancing interests and forget all about it.
huge price to get their token support.