Yeh no worries.
The board have done all they can to keep Klemmer happy.
There's a lot you don't know about the klemmer situation.
The in roads the board have done to re-build the club from it's grassroots has been phenominal.
They are laying the foudations for a strong a successful club for years to come.
Also, may I add, the potential Napa signing isn't a replacement for klemmer or a knee jerk reaction like some may think.
It's something Pay has requested as a "type" of player that he wants in his pack.(Personally I don't see Napa as a great signing)
If there's a type of way Pay and the coaching staff want the team to play moving forward then we should all respect that and see what his plans are for Napa.
He could be coached to play really well and might surprise us.
There's areas of Klemmers game the club has identified as negatives.
The meters he makes up the middle is second to none without question, but David does lack in many other areas of his game which doesn't justify him being a $1.2m prop.
They have been forever trying to introduce an offload and passing game with him but it just hasn't worked out.
While his post contact meters are great, if you watch him closely he'll carry a few defenders with him, turns his back, makes another couple of meters backwards, falls on his back and his play the balls are very slow. But then the defensive lines would have set. David's lateral movement isn't the best when it comes to his defence and rarely put's a bloke on his back with a good hit.
We manage to make good meters up the field but there isn't any great speed to our game to create attacking chances.
We need our forwards to hit the line at speed, fall on their stomachs and play the ball quickly to create momentum with the occassional offload or passing at the line to really bend the opposing defence and create momentum. This will give guys like old man Foran and Lewis the freedom to create try scoring chances.