bulldogsmyte
Kennel Enthusiast
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2009
- Messages
- 1,608
- Reaction score
- 2,549
If you read my OP I said 3 or 4 comps in the 5 years between 2003 and 2007. This was to cater for the massive injuries in 2005. I left out 2002 because of salary cap DQ.i did the count and the 2006 broncos team for the preliminary final had 14 state of origin players and 2 more players who would go on to play state of origin in their 17
this is a formidable opposition except the shane perry part, we had some holes in the team by the time of the preliminary final, willie tonga was out injured, tony grimaldi was the glue in our side was injured/retired, so our centre pairing is emelio/ben roberts, asotasi straight into the starting lineup after being injured for 5 weeks, holdsworth injured during the game which was ok since we had roberts and maitua on the bench but its a man down and a further reshuffle
btw im still pissed off about that game though, brisbane got a bullshit obstruction try and brisbane got a couple of calls when we were down a try late and could have got back into, a missed high shot on sbw and a 6 again non call
2005 was an injury ravaged season so don't include that in your 2003-2006 report either
Did you ever wonder why we had so many injuries in 05 particularly SBW with multiple injuries as well as the entire forward pack? Because Folkes didn't use SBW appropriately. He was a lean, athletic 2nd rower ball playing forward but Folkes had him doing hit ups in the middle and getting smashed by props and gang tackles. He was doing regulary 1st hit ups to get us out of our own 20m zone. Those regularly 1st tackle hit ups should be done by your stocky and meat and potato forwards and not your star ball playing forward.
Look back at how our side played back then and it often depended on a star forward showing some individual brilliance and crashing through the defence. Tries were also heavily dependent on kicks from Shifty and Anasta. Folkes did not enhance the team with smart tactics, passing skills, formations and ball movement but relied on a player's physical strength and fitness. That style of football can only result in mass injuries over the long term. Team skills were not developed over time and injuries caught up with most of the players.
So even though Big Willie spews a lot of garbage he definitely had a point with his critique of Folkes coaching ability.
If you think I'm wrong can you explain why no other club approached Folkes for the head coach role even after the 04 GF when usually a premiership winning coach is in hot demand?