2144superman
Kennel Legend
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2010
- Messages
- 10,366
- Reaction score
- 15,461
Left food in the fridge for too long LOLHow much stank must be down there, that it causes your dog to chunder? Wowsers.
Left food in the fridge for too long LOLHow much stank must be down there, that it causes your dog to chunder? Wowsers.
Dont need to, as if we can afford another high profile signing for 22?When’s Gus going to come out and kill this rumour once and for all ?
Lol you are dreaming if u think the Tigers will contribute 500kIf Tigers pay 500k of 850k and we offload Flanno for his full contract value, we are essentially paying 350k for Brooks and getting rid of Flanno. That is a very very good deal. BBO/Josh Cook should battle out for the 9 jersey with Avo in the 14. JMK is a NSW Cup 9.
NRL
1 Dufty
2 Cotric
3 Naden
4 Schoupp
5 JAC
6 Burton
7 Brooks
8 Thompson
9 Cook/BBO
10 Vaughan
11 Hetherington/RFM
12 TPJ
13 Jacko
14 Avo
15 Asiata
16 Patolo
17 RFM
NSW Cup
1 Allan
2 Larson-Doyle
3 Burns
4 Alamoti
5 Ok
6 Wakeham
7 BBO/JMK
8 Ava
9 JMK/Cook
10 King
11 Stimson
12 Waddell
13 Topine
14 ? - Doesn't really matter can be someone on train and trial
15 Tuifua/Makatoa/Turrahui
16 Doorey (when he returns, probably starts in fact)
17 Stuckey
So if we signed Brooks where does that leave Biondo odo?.Don’t rate him.biondi-odo will be our half back.
I hope so. Kid is talented and full of speedDon’t rate him.biondi-odo will be our half back.
i think he is better suited at hooker imoSo if we signed Brooks where does that leave Biondo odo?.
So the 'journalist' who wrote the article "The Bulldogs should be More Professional Like South Sydney" wrote:BROOKS PREFERS BULLDOGS OVER KNIGHTS FOR CLUB SWITCH
Tigers halfback Luke Brooks’s reported preference is to join the Bulldogs over the Knights if the Concord club decide to part ways with their long-time No.7.
The Sydney Morning Herald’s Andrew Webster revealed on SEN radio that the Knights are keen to lure Brooks to replace Mitchell Pearce, but the Tigers star has other ideas.
“They (Newcastle) have got their hearts set on Luke Brooks (as Mitchell Pearce’s replacement),” Webster said on SEN 1170 Mornings.
“The Tigers have said no to Luke Brooks going, and I think publicly he’s saying he doesn’t want to go, but his management is certainly saying things otherwise.
“It’s going around quite strongly, his preference would be the Bulldogs if he was to get out.”
The Tigers have denied wanting to let Brooks leave with two years remaining on his current deal worth around $850,000 a season.
The Tigers would likely have to chip in for Brooks to play elsewhere, while Pearce’s mooted departure would free up $600,000.
The Bulldogs would likely have to offload Kyle Flanagan and another player to come up with the money for Brooks.
However Webster believes Brooks should pursue the opportunity of playing under new Knights assistant and Immortal Andrew Johns at Newcastle after his defection from the Eels.
“I think the inclusion of Andrew Johns though on the coaching staff and as a halves coach on the Knights should be something that Luke Brooks finds appealing,” Webster said.
“If anyone has watched Luke Brooks over the last few years, he’s not to blame for the way the Tigers have played, there’s deeper problems at that club than the halfback.
“But if ever a playmaker looked like he needed a change, I think Luke Brooks is it.
“If he goes to Newcastle, which is a fairly strong side … if he’s under the tutelage of the halfback of the century and arguably the greatest player ever, he could do worse.”
We don’t sign him, where in ur right mind do you or anyone else entertaining this, do you see Gus allowing this ? Absolute rubbishSo if we signed Brooks where does that leave Biondo odo?.
No more gamblingI view Brooks as a super talented footballer whose career has never reached the heights it should have primarily because of the Tigers.
He is only 26 and his best footy might still be ahead at the right club.
He's 19. Developing in Canterbury Cup with Topine, Averillo and Alamoti - ready to take the 7 jersey in 2 seasons.So if we signed Brooks where does that leave Biondo odo?.
I trust Gus, so if we were to sign him i would be stoked.No more gambling
Incorrect, we missed out on Tedesco because he wanted Moses at the club - Des didn't.Just think of the ammount of players Linked to us since des left we basically were meant to sign everyone including turbo , Munster , cheese etc .. another shit article . Des didn’t want him cause all 3 woods Tedesco and Moses were gonna come if brooks was signed and he refused
I’d much prefer Newcastle to Sydney. Somewhere near Bar beach or mereweather would be ideal.I cant blame him, anyone would prefer Sydney to Newcastle. Im hoping knights like him more than we do though
Have to admit I've only seen around the main city part on my way to other places and didnt think much of it.I’d much prefer Newcastle to Sydney. Somewhere near Bar beach or mereweather would be ideal.