Jabba the Mutt
Kennel Participant
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2018
- Messages
- 229
- Reaction score
- 289
Absolutely captain!Its just a politicalty correct way of saying no dickheads.
Absolutely captain!Its just a politicalty correct way of saying no dickheads.
We are all f*kd then lolAre we back to the no dickhead policy again
I totally disagree with this point. Building a team with the right character and core values is definitely the way to go! Especially when your in the process of building a new team.How do you have Bulldogs DNA when you have never played for the club? Are we going to do stem sell therapy?
Just pick the best players available and if the coach is good enough he will get the best out of him.
You do realise that was a journalist quote dont you?? Not once did Hill mention it.This DNA talk is ridiculous and embarrassing. It’s all about the money, if you want the money then you Fucken turn up every week to play! Simple as that, same as every club in every sport in the world
They a have said it plenty of timesYou do realise that was a journalist quote dont you?? Not once did Hill mention it.
I agree. Values to set a high standard in the quality of the players invited to play for our club. Just the timing I question...with these long winded very public negotiations going on in the media.I think there is an element of window dressing in the statement by Anderson after the headlines we've received from "Mad Mondays" and the Napa videos. Values as far as fitting into our roster requirements is OK by me. We've seen something near the old Bulldogs team values in the past six matches, and that looks promising.
Exactly, leaving a club because you did not get enough ball but potentially wants to come to a team who averages 1-2 tries a game.Its got nothing to do with getting the ball....
Just like Klemmer its all got to do with cash
Ponga will be brilliant but he ain’t worth 1.5 mil right nowYes I did and sure, the Cowboys were average. But, you can always polish a gem. But no matter how much you work a turd it's still a turd.
I remember our club and many of its supporters saying "he is too skinny" "can play but has shoulders like a milk arrowroot" That kid left us and went on to be JT.. .
Ponga is miles ahead of where JT was at the same time in his career.
Nah, we just need to "structure" our deals as well as the rorters and others do...$1.5 mil will seem like a token payment after he helps deliver a couple of Premierships.Ponga will be brilliant but he ain’t worth 1.5 mil right now
That leaves 8 mil for 29 players
That leaves an average of 275k per player....
Tedesco on 1 mil at chooksNah, we just need to "structure" our deals as well as the rorters and others do...$1.5 mil will seem like a token payment after he helps deliver a couple of Premierships.
Thats nice for you and everyone..I dont agree. I also think you are naive if you think thats all Tedesco and Mitchel earn. The spin from the Roosters about all that scaling up crap and pecking order for biggest contracts is complete rubbish and also their best ever PR work.Tedesco on 1 mil at chooks
Mitchell is on 600 but contract up next year
So your saying ponga is worth just about those what those 2 combined is worth
Me and everyone says no....
It will be pretty hard to play when your in pieces lol.If they are going to make Jesse jump through hoops why dont they stick him a "saw" movie with a series of puzzles setup by jigsaw.
That will test him
So you would buy ponga for the same money you could get Tedesco and Mitchell for?Thats nice for you and everyone..I dont agree. I also think you are naive if you think thats all Tedesco and Mitchel earn. The spin from the Roosters about all that scaling up crap and pecking order for biggest contracts is complete rubbish and also their best ever PR work.
And yes, I would gladly buy Ponga on a 4 year contract instead of Teddy and Mitchel.
For the 1.6 mil you suggest they are on between them, yes I would in a heart beat. However, I think the combined they are actually earning is substantially more than that. Fact is we would never be a chance of stealing Tedesco and Mitchel from Uncle Nick but we could be a real shot of stealing Ponga if we paid the right money and showed him Premiership potential based on history and a plan to get back to the top.So you would buy ponga for the same money you could get Tedesco and Mitchell for?
Ok champ, ponga or both Tedesco and MitchellFor the 1.6 mil you suggest they are on between them, yes I would in a heart beat. However, I think the combined they are actually earning is substantially more than that. Fact is we would never be a chance of stealing Tedesco and Mitchel from Uncle Nick but we could be a real shot of stealing Ponga if we paid the right money and showed him Premiership potential based on history and a plan to get back to the top.
Its not personal mate its opinions thats all. And I'm no ones champ.. Like I said which you chose to ignore, the Tedesco/Mitchel together purchase is a wet dream and would never happen so why wish for it? The Ponga one could possibly happen and we would have young superstar in the making, whats wrong with that if you are a dogs fan?Ok champ, ponga or both Tedesco and Mitchell
And you chose ponga for similar coin as for both of those 2
[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
Have a good day sir