I agree. Tolman was an overpaid plodder, he worked hard in defense which we are now missing, but in attack he was stifling and embarrassing, (and still is). We will never be a top 4 team relying on the likes of Tolman (thank fully gone), Napa (hopefully soon gone) and Hetherington (needs to improve dramatically).Tolman was an overpaid plodder. Time to move on Horse.
He even has a passing game now. Funny how a good coach can bring out the best in a good player.Sharks fans are grinning like Cheshire cats at their Tolman acquisition.
The Sharks are averaging 24pts/game without their key playmaker so the old Tolman stifling the attack chestnut doesn’t seem to hold much weight other than amongst semen soaked armchair experts.
We 100% should’ve retained him for another year or 2 especially considering the laziness and sheer lack of defensive steel amongst the remaining middle forwards at the club. Let’s have a look at the numbers comparing the work of Tolman from the bench for the Sharks against our 4 x Props so far this year;
TOLMAN
2021 averages: 110m per game, 32 tackles per game @ 98% efficiency
OGDEN
2021 averages: 84m per game, 19 tackles per game @ 91% efficiency
HETHERINGTON
2021 averages: 92m per game, 25 tackles per game @ 88% efficiency
TOOMAGA
2021 averages: 74m per game, 23 tackles per game @ 93% efficiency
NAPA
2021 averages: 63m per game, 21 tackles per game @ 92% efficiency
Disgraceful numbers from our middles who have not stepped up to the plate. Many here won’t like to admit it but we are sorely missing Tolmans middle craft, particularly the extra work he got through, communication and cover defence. Our defence has been downright embarrassing and the loss of Tolman is a big reason for this.
Let’s hope Thompson stays fit as he’s by far our best middle forward, but we desperately need the others to step up.
Exactly. They showed the type of forwards you need to recruit to build a great pack. Fifita, Tino, Lisone and they already had Peachey, Moeaki, Wallace and Joliife..A lot of you lot are unable to be reasoned with, Tolman was part of our issue.
Success won’t come overnight, look at the Titans last year, they started terribly and improved throughout the year, hopefully that’s us.
We can’t continue to blame coaches, support staff, board for decisions of the past.
Thank fck Napa is off contract at end of the season as we do need a good middle.
I'm not even saying we should have re-signed Tolman.Tolman alone wouldn't change that and all of a sudden have us conceding 12 points a game. People forget we gave up huge scores to several teams over the past few seasons with Tolman in the team and more of a focus on a slow, defensive style of play under Pay and the old rules. So the problems run much deeper than Tolman's absence in defence....
But no doubt Baz has to make changes and shore up the defence because it's embarrassing and you can't win games giving up 30 plus a game. Starting Thompson and Topine and benching Waddell while moving Hoppa from centre would be a great start.
Hetherington is worse and I never liked the signing but he didn't cost much as Penrith are paying part of his deal. Waddell also didn't cost much as he was a bench player at Manly.I'm not even saying we should have re-signed Tolman.
The problem is we replaced him with worse players on more money.
This is a great post. Tolmans departure has exposed just how inept most of our middles are in defence. Tolman was a very good scrambler and covered up a lot of defence areas around the ruck. Although, he should have been banned from getting the ball anytime after tackle 3.In order to move "forward" sometimes one must take a step back...
How are you ever going know how the other forwards go when Tolman is taking their place and their work when they are off contract?
AND if Tolman was so good why didnt Des grab him when he lost Fonua-Blake considering he was on the market and apparently the best Prop in the Game according the Desmond?
Not doubting Tolman's work ethic but it was time to move on.. Now Tolman, Napa and Ogden will be out the door and with that 1.5mil hopefully we can acquire REAL forwards.
Despite winning their last two, the Roosters will fall apart without Keary, Friend and Cordner etc. They won't make the 4 and won't threaten Melbourne, Penrith or Souths in the finals..If the club was well run and the team was well coached it doesn't matter if you lose players - see the Roosters (a professional organisation with a top coach)
I thought at that time, that it may have been better to shop Napa around, even if we only saved $2K and have kept Tolman, but their was also the thought that Napa might play for another contract some where, which he obviously isn't.Sharks fans are grinning like Cheshire cats at their Tolman acquisition.
The Sharks are averaging 24pts/game without their key playmaker so the old Tolman stifling the attack chestnut doesn’t seem to hold much weight other than amongst semen soaked armchair experts.
We 100% should’ve retained him for another year or 2 especially considering the laziness and sheer lack of defensive steel amongst the remaining middle forwards at the club. Let’s have a look at the numbers comparing the work of Tolman from the bench for the Sharks against our 4 x Props so far this year;
TOLMAN
2021 averages: 110m per game, 32 tackles per game @ 98% efficiency
OGDEN
2021 averages: 84m per game, 19 tackles per game @ 91% efficiency
HETHERINGTON
2021 averages: 92m per game, 25 tackles per game @ 88% efficiency
TOOMAGA
2021 averages: 74m per game, 23 tackles per game @ 93% efficiency
NAPA
2021 averages: 63m per game, 21 tackles per game @ 92% efficiency
Disgraceful numbers from our middles who have not stepped up to the plate. Many here won’t like to admit it but we are sorely missing Tolmans middle craft, particularly the extra work he got through, communication and cover defence. Our defence has been downright embarrassing and the loss of Tolman is a big reason for this.
Let’s hope Thompson stays fit as he’s by far our best middle forward, but we desperately need the others to step up.
Yeah I have no idea which props the club will be able to get next season.Hetherington is worse and I never liked the signing but he didn't cost much as Penrith are paying part of his deal. Waddell also didn't cost much as he was a bench player at Manly.
The other guys we signed were Flanagan, Cotric and Allan so neither had an impact on Tolman or a prop.
Barrett rightly targeted Leniu who would have been perfect. Hopefully the next prop targeted is a similar style of prop.
But we already knew how our other props go?In order to move "forward" sometimes one must take a step back...
How are you ever going know how the other forwards go when Tolman is taking their place and their work when they are off contract?
Seems its our club.I thought at that time, that it may have been better to shop Napa around, even if we only saved $2K and have kept Tolman, but their was also the thought that Napa might play for another contract some where, which he obviously isn't.
Its a sad state of affairs for the whole game when players don't have ago,
I don't follow the AFL or Soccer, but I very much doubt that players just don't have ago in the other codes.
This means that our game, must have some inherent flaws. Perhaps it might only be at our club where players choose to not have ago.