- Joined
- Mar 1, 2004
- Messages
- 11,174
- Reaction score
- 11,773
"have", not "of".Only thing about that is if Mahoney stayed down they might of ruled it category one and he wouldn’t of came back on.
"have", not "of".Only thing about that is if Mahoney stayed down they might of ruled it category one and he wouldn’t of came back on.
Watch Tino's face in the replay from this article in today's SMH, especially as Mahoney hits the ground. He knew what he was doing.Not an elbow to Reed Mahoneys, it was Tino's forearm. Which should have constituted a sin bin followed by a penalty.
If that happens they’ll never attract new recruits. Who’d want to do that job when you’ve got people baying for your blood each and every week.need to start holding every reff accountable if we are to see any change.
Obviously! Mahoney blatantly headbutt Tina's forearm, he should've been sent off and suspended.
What a joke, lifts TPJ in a dangerous position and gets off - anyone else would have copped a game.
Precedent set- our forwards can now run with their forearms raised and bash blokes in the head.
Yeah watching it live it definitely looked like Boyd jumped in front of the Dogs player and took the dive. He had plenty of time to get up and make an effort on Alamoti when he eventually get the ball but he chose to lay there like a star fish.To me one of the biggest howlers was the disallowing of the Alomotti try. In no way shape of form was any one obstructed from making a tackle in that movement of play that would of actually made a tackle to prevent him from scoring .The NRL keep introducing stupid rules with no common sense. How can you rule and obstruction when no one was actually obstructed. I question how that was disallowed but the Warriors try against us earlier this year was allowed to stand.
I agree with your point of view but if they call it that way at least be consistent. If that's a no try, then how is the Fonua-Blake play where he obstructed Mahoney a try? Then Annesley comes out and defends the decision. And he'll probably defend this one... We never get an obstruction call go our way in attack or defence even if the situation's are exactly the same.To me one of the biggest howlers was the disallowing of the Alomotti try. In no way shape of form was any one obstructed from making a tackle in that movement of play that would of actually made a tackle to prevent him from scoring .The NRL keep introducing stupid rules with no common sense. How can you rule and obstruction when no one was actually obstructed. I question how that was disallowed but the Warriors try against us earlier this year was allowed to stand.
And baying for blood is deserved, may be a hard game to reff. But it’s not good enough, and with the way it’s going league will lose a lot of supporters etc If it gets even more out of hand with the ridiculous interpretations.If that happens they’ll never attract new recruits. Who’d want to do that job when you’ve got people baying for your blood each and every week.
I’d like to see TK members volunteer to ref an NRL game at the speed at which it’s played and deliver flawless adjudication. Now that’s a game I’d watch .
OK. Enjoy watching the lawn bowls .And baying for blood is deserved, may be a hard game to reff. But it’s not good enough, and with the way it’s going league will lose a lot of supporters etc If it gets even more out of hand with the ridiculous interpretations.
Nah mate, if it’s not nrl then it’s horses or darts, no other sport interests me… I except going out fishing and catching some beauty snapper or going to raid the mussel farms lol.OK. Enjoy watching the lawn bowls .