hulk hogan
Kennel Participant
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2014
- Messages
- 191
- Reaction score
- 137
Sutton cheats NRL are a jokeLook how they explain the knock the grub
View attachment 5809
Sutton cheats NRL are a jokeLook how they explain the knock the grub
View attachment 5809
Who's Greenberg? Is he related to greenturd?Well I have seen and heard it all. Every decision which pay complained about on Sutton was defended by his brother. Should we now call this game “Sutton’s League” surely someone has to speak up with authority or are the all corrupt including Greenberg.
Foran tried to drop kick it like Slater but failed lol .don't need to go that far back
just compare the knock on from foran in the first half from kick off, that went backwards too.
he was wearing the wrong jersey hence it was called a knock on.
Yeah everyone says it’s a knock on but Sutton and @Kaz .
FMD still fucking fuming over that game.
I’m the same not going to watch any more games fuck the nrl.I think I am completely switching off from rugby league.
usually I do watch games on Friday night no matter who is playing tonight I had no motivation to watch it. I am happy I am not following this game that is run by the corrupt mafia.
lets see how long will this last.
Can you please tell me where in that 10% is the knock back?It's pretty funny tbh.
I don't necessarily disagree with it being ruled knocked back but conservatively speaking that's been called a knock on 90% of the time for the last 3 years.
Poor wittle baby.FMD still fucking fuming over that game.
Until Friday night at 7.55pmI think I am completely switching off from rugby league.
usually I do watch games on Friday night no matter who is playing tonight I had no motivation to watch it. I am happy I am not following this game that is run by the corrupt mafia.
lets see how long will this last.
Let's not forget this is the NRL shit flows down from the top. Greenturd gags the clubs from talking about the officials, enables the refs to ruin the game with bullshit calls and we as fans are force fed the crap they tend to dish out as fair and just.Well I have seen and heard it all. Every decision which pay complained about on Sutton was defended by his brother. Should we now call this game “Sutton’s League” surely someone has to speak up with authority or are the all corrupt including Greenberg.
I'm saying Bernard Sutton is correct, ball travelled back from the original point of contact but 90% of the time that's been ruled as a knock on from what we've seen from refs the last 3 years. It's "funny" that Gerard uses that instance to correctly call that a play onCan you please tell me where in that 10% is the knock back?
Obviously the prick is going to back his own brother.
No penalty for this. They were doing it all game long.
View attachment 5810
Defensive lines can advance as soon as the ball is in the process of being played (or "cleared the ruck") doesn't require the dummy half to touch the ballThere's like 6 offside in that one picture. Ridiculous.
Way to go wolfieWho's Greenberg? Is he related to greenturd?
No point hiding it. We're gonna find it... It's woodenPoor wittle baby.
Wait until Pay is fined.
I await your post about it.
Hides shit stirring spoon.
It was a knock-on because Isaako propelled the ball forwards. Momentum from the direction from where Isaako was coming from made the actual direction of the ball bounce backwards. If is like when balls are passed backwards out of a hand & yet float forward because of the momentum of the player passing the ball. Simple physics. Someone should explain this to the Sutton crew.I'm saying Bernard Sutton is correct, ball travelled back from the original point of contact but 90% of the time that's been ruled as a knock on from what we've seen from refs the last 3 years. It's "funny" that Gerard uses that instance to correctly call that a play on