- Joined
- May 7, 2011
- Messages
- 37,246
- Reaction score
- 29,877
"if" is the question. As I pointed out above. Even though Montagnier stated that he believed vaccination lead to mutation, it was quickly shut down by the virologists who are actually researching it.This is the problem with Science these days - everyone is hunting a headline. He's right and he's wrong. Its an arms race - all virus mutates to something that is resistant to whatever over time. Viral vaccines struggle to keep up with the mutations, so you need to be vaccinated all the time. Bacterial vaccines stay in front of the arms race due to slower replication to the point where it isn't a war usually. And it all due to the complexity of the organism. Bacteria mutations have more moving bits so adaption is slower.
The immune system has more adaptability than a single process step vaccine. Its why, despite being vaccinated, I've not been particularly enthused by it. If my work didn't depend on it - probably wouldn't have been vaccinated. Just my view - don't think anyones right or wrong on their view.
And here is where I think the anti-vax crew may have a valid argument. If vaccinated individuals are generating more mutations then the anti-vax and those mutations impact anti-vaxers more than vaxxers, is that on the vaxxers? Its a very interesting philosophical argument.
So it would be an interesting philosophical question, if it had a basis in reality.
But if it did then that would be great. Our plan to wipe out most of the population would work. We just need agent Zilla to keep convincing people to remain unvaccinated.