- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 22,161
- Reaction score
- 22,880
#looking through the keyhole# Lovely!! Bahahaha!!!Lol I work alone
Last edited:
#looking through the keyhole# Lovely!! Bahahaha!!!Lol I work alone
I don't read past headlinesGuys these were all in the link that wolfy posted which I clicked on. Screenshot below.
View attachment 8380
Lebanon should be respected for accepting refugees but considering proximity , lifestyle similarities and the declining population due to half of Lebanon emigrating to lakemba it makes perfect sense.Yes, but the debate is over the amount of refugees a country has taken in. Lebanon is still probably up top but less than half of those refugees were officially accepted and registered by the Lebanese government. It also includes the refugees given temporary refugee status as oppose to the ones given permanent residential status.
That said, I'm not sure if the debate was over those who have permanently accepted refugees as citizens. Or those whose have accepted temporary refugees.
I'm not sure why you guys are engaging in an argument which seems to be along the lines of "whichever country takes the most refugees is morally and ethically the best country in the world".
Look at Germany who had a huge influx of refugees for a variety of well documented reasons, but then look at the social issues that have resulted.
I think any smart cookie can easily realize that the number of people a country can take each year is limited and it is probably more effective to focus on how you INTEGRATE the people that come to your country, rather than getting caught up in how many you accept.
For example, in Australia there could clearly be more done to integrate new arrivals in a better way. The majority of terror incidents here have been committed by refugees or children of refugees.
And worse, I heard it's full of French poofter *****Romantic? Not so much it’s a filthy shit hole
Non-Muslims are victims, Muslims are evil terrorists.a terror incident only happens when the criminal is a muslim.
a non muslim running over muslim kid on bourke street and killing few more , was never a terror incident.
Non-Muslims are victims, Muslims are evil terrorists.
Brought to you by the MSM.
why do people blame PC for all the problems? its the go to thing for blame nowFrance has definitely changed in the last few years. It went from the gold standard of living then the PC activists forced the government to take in more people than it could sustain now those PC activists are rioting because their comfortable lifestyles have changed.
john howard should have listened to the labor opposition ffs, blame the liberal party if you dont like any refugeesAlso - look at how awful our immigration policies were under the Labor government where something like 50,000 people rocked up over a few years claiming asylum.
Now that we have some decent policies we can actually focus (IMO) on the people who are truly deserving of our charity. Rather than getting caught up in thousands of applications for people who wanted to come here to try and get a decent job.
Na mate I don't accept the truth, I accept what the media tells me.Some of them muslims really are evil terrorist but they are on both sides.
I tend to agree to a certain point. Refugees do cause problems due to cultural clashes. It's nowhere near the amount that the Nationalists would attempt to convince you of, but there are obvious problems including the rise in rape crimes in countries like Germany and Sweden, and the rise in youth crime in areas like Melbourne.I'm not sure why you guys are engaging in an argument which seems to be along the lines of "whichever country takes the most refugees is morally and ethically the best country in the world".
Look at Germany who had a huge influx of refugees for a variety of well documented reasons, but then look at the social issues that have resulted.
I think any smart cookie can easily realize that the number of people a country can take each year is limited and it is probably more effective to focus on how you INTEGRATE the people that come to your country, rather than getting caught up in how many you accept.
For example, in Australia there could clearly be more done to integrate new arrivals in a better way. The majority of terror incidents here have been committed by refugees or children of refugees.
To show that I'm capable of thinking and agreeing with ideas that don't fit with my generally conservative out look on things:I tend to agree to a certain point. Refugees do cause problems due to cultural clashes. It's nowhere near the amount that the Nationalists would attempt to convince you of, but there are obvious problems including the rise in rape crimes in countries like Germany and Sweden, and the rise in youth crime in areas like Melbourne.
There's no denying that, but this discussion is about the riots in France which have nothing to do with immigration or terrorism. They have to do with increasing tax prices. The primary driver being climate tax.
I agree (in part). It was the Liberals immigration minister Amanda Vanstone who was responsible for the sudanese intake.john howard should have listened to the labor opposition ffs, blame the liberal party if you dont like any refugees
PC's are far worse because they're like monkeys with guns.why do people blame PC for all the problems? its the go to thing for blame now
if your ice cream is not as solid as it should be then its because of PC, if a lady gets cast in a movie its PC
how about right wing rich fucks and racists or religious nuts starting wars for money or to kill people, that directly creates the resentment and the refugee crisis, blame them sometimes
Don't bother with Rodzilla, he's so far left that Fidel Castro is far right in his eyes.PC's are far worse because they're like monkeys with guns.
They've got all this power in their hands and you can't reason with them. If you do you're shot down for being racist, sexist, antifemist etc