Thoughts on Pritchards Hit.

Status
Not open for further replies.

JUNKYARD DOGS

Kennel Addict
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
7,089
Reaction score
3,604
For me should be safe. Brilliant tackle.

Will he be gone for any games., Thoughts.....
 

JMP2024

Waterboy
Joined
Feb 20, 2008
Messages
99
Reaction score
8
Phucken Brilliant!!!

Ball runner fell into the tackle as Pritchard had already committed to the line tackle, but rules are rules (pathetic!!)... Shoulder came into contact with the head first... Hopefully they go easier on the big unit come judiciary.
 

Sandra's Bollocks

Est. 1979
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
8,844
Reaction score
8,352
shouldve been an 8 point try just for that hit alone lol. seriously though i think he'll get a week.
 

S4Sonny

Ooh Ahh Cantona
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
12,874
Reaction score
162
Simmons was falling into the tackle, and Pritchard had already committed to the hit.

Judiciary will probably charge him though.

How about the Weston shot on Graham? Was that place on report? That was just careless, flung the arm out and clobbered Graham.
 

Aristidiz

Bullwog
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
3,069
Reaction score
2,614
No! They just had to give a penalty firstly because they were infront of a penrith crowd and he made contact with the head (even though he fell into it) and secondly he scored a try in the ensuing moments and it would have made the refs look even worse if we scored off that sort of hit.
 
P

Paint.

Guest
I think he'll cop a match or two. Simmons fell into the tackle, so he'll have some sort of an argument.. not too much hope tho
 

Dognacious

Kennel Immortal
Staff member
Administrator
Premium Member
NF Draft Champion
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
23,611
Reaction score
11,069
I dont think frank will have anything to worry about. May be dismissed before it reaches the judiciary. Simmons stepped into the tackle and there was no obvious leading with the shoulder. Just a collision, going for the ball and all tackle.
 

Bad Billy

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Jan 25, 2010
Messages
16,935
Reaction score
13,164
It's a crock ! There was nothing in it ! Just a solid hit. If they start charging players for that, the judiciary is gonna be busy. You can't charge people for "incidental" contact, unless its reckless or careless, it's clean !
 

Bry

Kennel Legend
Joined
May 8, 2005
Messages
8,259
Reaction score
29
Should be sweet. It wasn't a shoulder charge where you are out of control, it was a front on tackle and as Frank came in to hit him, Simmons swerved and ducked when he realised he was going to get crunched. It's completely his fault he was ko'd. Frank would have put his shoulders through Simmons ribs if he didn't duck down.
 

Aristidiz

Bullwog
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
3,069
Reaction score
2,614
It's a crock ! There was nothing in it ! Just a solid hit. If they start charging players for that, the judiciary is gonna be busy. You can't charge people for "incidental" contact unless its reckless or careless, it's clean !
agreed
 

Ironhide07

In The Dog House
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Messages
958
Reaction score
4
He fell for Pritchard lol and got knocked the **** out. Awesome hit dont think there will be anything to come out of it.
 

Mr Beast

Admin
Staff member
Administrator
Premium Member
Gilded
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
9,052
Reaction score
5,375
Big hit that is what footy is all about... should have been a try.. man up NRL fmd killing the game. This is the sort of hits that the fans love to see.
 

The Beer Baron

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
1,275
Reaction score
5
Does Frank have any carry over points ??

Looks bad played at 'normal' speed, should be ok, but you never know.
 

JMP2024

Waterboy
Joined
Feb 20, 2008
Messages
99
Reaction score
8
Just a pure text book hit coming out the line.... ask any footy coach for a response and no doubt they would demand that type hit for 80 mins... part & parcel of contact sport called Rugby League...
 

MP4 - Eedz

C.O.T.B
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
12,848
Reaction score
43
Massive problem with our game if he serves time for that hit ...

In the context of the game ... ok stupid rule, penalty whatever

BUT for us to be at a disadvantage next week because of it would be very sad
 

GTJOHN

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 6, 2008
Messages
1,006
Reaction score
1
Was a good hit, ball carrier was falling...no way will he have anything to worry about..\
in my mind was not even penalty worthy..if simmons didnt go down , no action
would have been taken
 

bleedblue&white

go the berries
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
780
Reaction score
189
imagine exactly the same event however symonds was franks height! ends up in a head clash no penalty and a bulldogs try! very very soft from the refs, a couple of years back that young tiger smashed hargraves from the roosters and everyone said it was the hit of the year! But when a dog does it its a penalty???
 

MP4 - Eedz

C.O.T.B
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
12,848
Reaction score
43
imagine exactly the same event however symonds was franks height! ends up in a head clash no penalty and a bulldogs try! very very soft from the refs, a couple of years back that young tiger smashed hargraves from the roosters and everyone said it was the hit of the year! But when a dog does it its a penalty???
Exactly ... if Romelo put the hit on I'd understand but what exactly do you want the guy to do ?
 

Chris Harding

Steam Powered Dog
Premium Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
11,174
Reaction score
11,773
Simmons was falling into the tackle, and Pritchard had already committed to the hit.

Judiciary will probably charge him though.

How about the Weston shot on Graham? Was that place on report? That was just careless, flung the arm out and clobbered Graham.
Radio says Weston was put on report.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top