Official Round 15 - Dogs vs Sharks - Consolidated Match Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
BulldogsNRL

BulldogsNRL

Kennel Established
Joined
Apr 3, 2019
Messages
951
Reaction score
318
RookieDog said:
Dugan front foot planted and in front of Moylan before second kick from Moylan.

No try.

Also bullshit call when Balsa tried to offload and ref called it a strip and penalized us. Feki scored in subsequent set.

The icing on the cake shit decision wise was the Johnson try.

Ball clearly came off Shark player's left hand and went forward onto the ground.

Sounds like a knock on I'd say.

On field ref said no try.

Even despite on field call of no try, video ref supposedly had conclusive evidence to overturn on field decision.

The **** in the video box looked at the knock on part ONCE before awarding the try.

Are you fuckin' kidding me?

The game was rigged against us
Click to expand...
He was in front slightly but fuck the controversy and enjoy the Winnn
 
BulldogsNRL

BulldogsNRL

Kennel Established
Joined
Apr 3, 2019
Messages
951
Reaction score
318
If anything the Dogs backed their defence which is great and they did it for Tolman
 
Wahesh

Wahesh

The Forefather of The Kennel
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
24,864
Reaction score
12,206
Don't you just love that even with the bye coming up we're still guaranteed to be last after round 16?
 
S

Son Of Dogzilla

Kennel Participant
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
145
Reaction score
189
Matty said:
Liicha was fantastic today. Almost player of the match for mine. Cogger also controlled the game well with foran going down early. A good way to end a weekend for once
Click to expand...
i thought he tackled well, but his service is still slow and shit he makes JMK look like Cameron Smith.
 
TwinTurbo

TwinTurbo

Kennel Legend
Gilded
Joined
Oct 22, 2018
Messages
9,457
Reaction score
15,714
I believe it is even more important for us to complain about not getting the 50/50 calls when we win the game. That way we can't be accused of blaming a loss on the refs. We won despite them, which shouldn't at any time stop us from complaining.

The fact is the Sharks were expected to win, and win comfortably, so the refs naturally look for reasons why they aren't winning. For example find penalties for them were none exist, after all we must be cheating to be winning. Disallow our tries because they don't think we are good enough to score them. Allowing their tries because they believe that they are good enough to score them. It's simple expectation bias, of course it's unconscious bias, but that doesn't mean it isn't real and affects us.

Go Dogs
 
dogluva

dogluva

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Nov 23, 2007
Messages
17,730
Reaction score
8,415
Mr Invisible said:
How I see it.

People will play down todays win, but Sharks had 2 tries that should never have been awarded (Dugan offside from a kick, and Johnstons try). Add to that a third try literally gifted to them by walking them upfield from a bullshit call.
Countless other penalties too.
We bombed a few chances to make the score higher.
Teams will always lift or fail, that's rugby league and you can't say "ha Sharks played shit that's why we won". Dogs still required an effort to not only play today but hold onto the lead.
Click to expand...
Oh yeah....that Dugan one was a pearler.....the video ref craps on as they do and then says.... and Dugan is............(then nothing) . We saw many replays of it and wondered if the commentary team had said something about it because you normally don't get as many replays....we were of the opinion that the last replay ( shown AFTER the try was awarded )clearly indicated that Dugan was offside....
 
RookieDog

RookieDog

Dogs1
Joined
Oct 1, 2009
Messages
1,557
Reaction score
1,745
dogluva said:
Oh yeah....that Dugan one was a pearler.....the video ref craps on as they do and then says.... and Dugan is............(then nothing) . We saw many replays of it and wondered if the commentary team had said something about it because you normally don't get as many replays....we were of the opinion that the last replay ( shown AFTER the try was awarded )clearly indicated that Dugan was offside....
Click to expand...
Yeah you are spot on about the then nothing part - it was just silence. It stood out like Dogs balls

The word the video ref was unable to bring himself to say after reviewing the footage was "offside" to make his full observation "Dugan is offside"

But Sharks were supposed to score because Sharks were supposed to beat Bulldogs so let's just change reality and say Dugan was onside.

The fact is Dugan was not onside because he timed his run through for the first kick. He was clearly offside for the second kick - leading foot planted on the ground in front of Moylan before Moylan even did the second kick

Correct ruling: NO try penalty to Bulldogs
 
KiwiDog7

KiwiDog7

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Messages
15,972
Reaction score
24,584
speedy2460 said:
It wasnt convenient at all that I forgot Hoppa. He played better than he has been but is still a borderline first grader.
He usually misses a heap of tackles, is usually out of position, and he is far to slow. But, today was one of his better games.
Click to expand...
True

He was named man of the match by the way
 
Dogtime

Dogtime

Kennel Enthusiast
Premium Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
2,013
Reaction score
2,191
RookieDog said:
Yeah you are spot on about the then nothing part - it was just silence. It stood out like Dogs balls

The word the video ref was unable to bring himself to say after reviewing the footage was "offside" to make his full observation "Dugan is offside"

But Sharks were supposed to score because Sharks were supposed to beat Bulldogs so let's just change reality and say Dugan was onside.

The fact is Dugan was not onside because he timed his run through for the first kick. He was clearly offside for the second kick - leading foot planted on the ground in front of Moylan before Moylan even did the second kick

Correct ruling: NO try penalty to Bulldogs
Click to expand...
Dugan looked onside to me. From the available video evidence he looks to be maybe 10cm behind on the 2nd kick. Take another look...draw a line parallel to the try line and youll see it was fine.
 
Dogtime

Dogtime

Kennel Enthusiast
Premium Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
2,013
Reaction score
2,191
TwinTurbo said:
I believe it is even more important for us to complain about not getting the 50/50 calls when we win the game. That way we can't be accused of blaming a loss on the refs. We won despite them, which shouldn't at any time stop us from complaining.

The fact is the Sharks were expected to win, and win comfortably, so the refs naturally look for reasons why they aren't winning. For example find penalties for them were none exist, after all we must be cheating to be winning. Disallow our tries because they don't think we are good enough to score them. Allowing their tries because they believe that they are good enough to score them. It's simple expectation bias, of course it's unconscious bias, but that doesn't mean it isn't real and affects us.

Go Dogs
Click to expand...
Wrong. Ben Cummins hates us but he said No Try on the Nikora one but was overruled incorrectly Then when the big bloke made a break and we tackled him 5mtr out from our line we took an eternity to get off him... Cummins could of blown a penalty under the posts to Sharks but didnt So I strongly disagree that the refs were biased against us due to our ladder position.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top