St Helens has a historical win rate of 69% and he took over from the 74% winning Daniel Anderson who actually won Cups and Championships while Mick didn't, furthermore he had losing records with the Dragons and Bulls.
But that doesn't tell the whole story of his profile. I just don't think he's a drawcard, maybe that doesn't matter because we have Gus, maybe it does - we'll never really know.
Edit: If he could continue to get results out of the team for the rest of the year then it could be investigated but I think we're on a tighter schedule then that.