- Joined
- May 7, 2011
- Messages
- 37,172
- Reaction score
- 29,700
I'd say it's more like offering to check women's drinks for date rape drugs before they get drunk and pass out in the gutter from alcohol poisoning rather than a spiked drink.
One dead, one in a coma, two others stable after Sydney festival overdoses
- Thread starter Wahesh
- Start date
- Joined
- May 7, 2011
- Messages
- 37,172
- Reaction score
- 29,700
Haha. Pop some dingers. If that's not a euphemism for sucking dick, I don't know what is.
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2004
- Messages
- 22,403
- Reaction score
- 2,707
While we are on the subject of drugs.
Do all these dealers who around in Ferrari’s and live in a fibro housing commission home honestly believe they’re outsmarting the law?
If the answer is yes, then that’s a good laugh is all I’ll say.
Do all these dealers who around in Ferrari’s and live in a fibro housing commission home honestly believe they’re outsmarting the law?
If the answer is yes, then that’s a good laugh is all I’ll say.
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2013
- Messages
- 73,016
- Reaction score
- 78,742
I used to snort nodoz when i was in highschool and tried to finish an entire assignment in a single night.
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2012
- Messages
- 19,608
- Reaction score
- 16,684
Dinger was a euphemism for condom when I was a lad.
Mr Invisible
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2008
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 47
This has hallmarks similar to "the war on speeding". One has to accept there will always be speed related deaths therefore an attempt to hit 0 deaths on the roads in a year is impossible.
Same applies to people doing drugs at concerts. It's unlikely you'll ever get the death toll to 0, and given we are talking very few deaths a year already from concerts (and seems all drug related ones are from the same genre), it becomes a case of accepting the collateral and letting people sort themselves out.
It's like saying "Gee it's awefully risky running across a freeway blindfolded and not getting hit by a car". Well it's simple... don't run across a freeway blindfolded and that risk is completely mitigated.
Drug taking at festivals isn't an unavoidable situation, it's completely avoidable. The solution shouldn't be to try and make it safer, because safety isn't really required, common sense is.
Why does the government need to step in and solve other peoples stupidity (in the above example the government would ban driving on freeways or the wearing of blindfolds).
Can't easily stop someone snorting a line of coke off a shitter in a nightclub, unless you put cameras where people take a dump. So it'll always exist in some way or form (through people that can't have fun without the need for a drug).
Banning the events is a way to try and stop people engaging in such content on a large scale. The government will never agree with openly testing pills (GTM was an exception and nobody has done it since), nor should they.
Besides, if people want to test pills, they can buy testing kits online and do it themselves.
When you start to accept and promote pill testing, legal liability rears it's ugly head. What happens when little Johnny gets his pills tested, the tests are wrong, he pops a few tabs, and ends up dead?
Suddenly the tax payer is paying for a multi million law suit because little Johnny took a handful of tablets and whilst ONE tested okay the other 5 in his pocket didn't.
Hence another issue in all this. 5 identical tablets won't always have identical chemical compositions.
RBTs/RDTs are designed to capture people operating a MOTOR VEHICLE (under the influence of alcohol/drugs), can and often sadly do become a deadly weapon.
Same applies to people doing drugs at concerts. It's unlikely you'll ever get the death toll to 0, and given we are talking very few deaths a year already from concerts (and seems all drug related ones are from the same genre), it becomes a case of accepting the collateral and letting people sort themselves out.
It's like saying "Gee it's awefully risky running across a freeway blindfolded and not getting hit by a car". Well it's simple... don't run across a freeway blindfolded and that risk is completely mitigated.
Drug taking at festivals isn't an unavoidable situation, it's completely avoidable. The solution shouldn't be to try and make it safer, because safety isn't really required, common sense is.
Why does the government need to step in and solve other peoples stupidity (in the above example the government would ban driving on freeways or the wearing of blindfolds).
Get your ball and get off my lawn you hoodlum!! *shakes walking stick from prime position in old cane rocking chair on front verandah*.
Drug use will always exist. Be it in a home or at a event.
Can't easily stop someone snorting a line of coke off a shitter in a nightclub, unless you put cameras where people take a dump. So it'll always exist in some way or form (through people that can't have fun without the need for a drug).
Banning the events is a way to try and stop people engaging in such content on a large scale. The government will never agree with openly testing pills (GTM was an exception and nobody has done it since), nor should they.
Besides, if people want to test pills, they can buy testing kits online and do it themselves.
Two totally different scenarios.
When you start to accept and promote pill testing, legal liability rears it's ugly head. What happens when little Johnny gets his pills tested, the tests are wrong, he pops a few tabs, and ends up dead?
Suddenly the tax payer is paying for a multi million law suit because little Johnny took a handful of tablets and whilst ONE tested okay the other 5 in his pocket didn't.
Hence another issue in all this. 5 identical tablets won't always have identical chemical compositions.
Because RBTs are checking legal alcohol consumption, not taking of illegal drugs.
RBTs/RDTs are designed to capture people operating a MOTOR VEHICLE (under the influence of alcohol/drugs), can and often sadly do become a deadly weapon.
So you don't want to have a beer with Duncan? Cause Duncan's me mate
Bad Billy
Kennel Immortal
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2010
- Messages
- 16,850
- Reaction score
- 13,037
Fuck Duncan.So you don't want to have a beer with Duncan? Cause Duncan's me mate
Duncan's a ****.
Mr Invisible
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2008
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 47
Who deals pingers laced with chlorine at dance festivals?
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2012
- Messages
- 107,731
- Reaction score
- 120,328
- Joined
- May 25, 2011
- Messages
- 22,588
- Reaction score
- 20,581
Yeah, Bill Hicks was great. My favourite comedian of all time.
A
Alexander the Great
Guest
Lol at imports. Fuck that's brought back memories back in the scene.
It's all caps these days from what I hear and see.
Range from 25 to 40 depending on quality.
A
Alexander the Great
Guest
Local junk are being pressed with chalk. Not joking..
A
Alexander the Great
Guest
The law are working with them. FACT
A
Alexander the Great
Guest
You badcunt
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2013
- Messages
- 73,016
- Reaction score
- 78,742
So bad that Parents banned their kids from being friends with me.
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2004
- Messages
- 22,403
- Reaction score
- 2,707
No doubt there’s corruption with law enforcement.
I’ve dealt with it myself on and off over the years.
I even had a cop tell me he would of done nothing about it if I smacked a smartass teenager in the mouth when I was guarding a gate at soundwave years ago.
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2012
- Messages
- 107,731
- Reaction score
- 120,328
Lol, I'm a fkn grandpa brother, I just used to confiscate them from clubs and sell them back for 20 a pop, I'm a business man lol
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2012
- Messages
- 107,731
- Reaction score
- 120,328
Straight OG ma nice guy
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2004
- Messages
- 22,403
- Reaction score
- 2,707
I once found a gram of cocaine and threw it in the bin like it was no big deal.
I had a friend who was given a bag of cocaine which someone “found”.
Turned out to be heroin, he never tested it before using and snorted a massive line of it and its turned him into a bit of a space cadet.