Yes it was an unfortunate collision but there is a duty of care that Mitchell is responsible for. I think penalty would have been sufficient.
To be honest, I could do with less of "duty of care" out of the NRL. If this is in response to Reece Walsh, it's the same nonsense over and over.
They condition the fans to be as unreasonable as they are being. You cannot eliminate accidents. And the casual way they punish these things is deciding outcomes.
Eg. Ok, Tass maybe stays on the field, because Sutton can find precedent where he doesn't have to bin him
Well, why not the same for Morrin. I've seen other tame "dumping tackles" where the ref has accepted a penalty us sufficient.
But as always, the talking points of the round before fuck us specifically, until the officials regain their composure