Kids Shows Non-Binary Characters

Rodzilla

Terry Lamb 1996
Joined
Dec 22, 2004
Messages
42,614
Reaction score
6,185
And here’s angry old Zil on the rampage again :tearsofjoy:.

It was about controlling birth rates in the third world where disease, famine and likely aid could be difficult to manage over time. Handing out condoms in Africa in the 1980’s was an example of that. So there’s a clear and obvious difference between sustainable population growth and ‘depopulation’ ie: murdering people already born - which is what you said the Covid vaccine was: ‘mass murder’ - yet we’re all still here…

Keep the entertainment coming via multiple nonsense outburst posts. Maybe you should focus on your man RFK Jr and his ‘chances’ of taking office as POTUS in 12 months. Won’t happen? ‘They’ must’ve done it :tearsofjoy:.
so why did they classify it and express ways to hide that they are doing it?

first of all depopulation is not strictly murdering people already born, its any action taken to reduce the population and i argue that it includes reducing the population in the future compared to what it would have been

but ok lets just go with your theory that depopulation is only about murder, let me create a new word that describes taking action that limits the growth of the world population, lets call it MATATESHI

so the kissinger report is about a conspiracy to MATATESHI, they want to secretly MATATASHI so they put it down on paper

and so lets compare the report to things that actually happened in the world and then lets see if they implemented it or not, lets see what they mean by providing services

1. Encouraging the World Bank and other international funding mechanisms, through the U.S. representatives on the boards of these organizations, to take a broader initiative in the development of inexpensive service delivery mechanisms in countries wishing to expand such systems.

2. Indicating U.S. willingness (as the U.S. did at the World Population Conference) to join with other donors and organizations to encourage and support further action by LDC governments and other institutions in the low- cost delivery systems area. A. As offered at Bucharest, the U.S. should join donor countries, WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF and the World Bank to create a consortium to offer assistance to the more needy developing countries to establish their own low-cost preventive and curative public health systems reaching into all areas of their countries and capable of national support within a reasonable period. Such systems would include family planning services as an ordinary part of their overall services. B. The WHO should be asked to take the leadership in such an arrangement and is ready to do so. Apparently at least half of the potential donor countries and the EEC's technical assistance program are favourably inclined. So is the UNFPA and UNICEF. The U.S., through its representation on the World Bank Board, should encourage a broader World Bank initiative in this field, particularly to assist in the development of inexpensive, basic health service infrastructures in countries wishing to undertake the development of such systems.

so this report was in december 1974, so lets see what happened in 1975 in india, maybe you should make some phone calls to confirm this with your indian telemarketer friends

India's dark history of sterilisation - BBC News

India's dark history of sterilisation


The drive to sterilise began in the 1970s when, encouraged by loans amounting to tens of millions of dollars from the World Bank, the Swedish International Development Authority and the UN Population Fund, India embarked on an ambitious population control programme.
During the 1975 Emergency - when civil liberties were suspended - Sanjay Gandhi, son of the former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, began what was described by many as a "gruesome campaign" to sterilise poor men. There were reports of police cordoning off villages and virtually dragging the men to surgery.

An astonishing 6.2 million Indian men were sterilised in just a year, which was "15 times the number of people sterilised by the Nazis", according to science journalist Mara Hvistendahl. Two thousand men died from botched operations.



ok so what do you think happened here? did the Gandhi son understand himself that he needed to cut millions of penises, was he a trendsetter and hero to the transgender community? was he looking to open a sausage factory and this was the easiest way to produce sausage? or did they actually follow through with the kissinger report and bribed the indians to do it, or as the report stated "encourage the world bank and other funding mechanisms to developing delivery mechanisms for providing integrated health and family planning services"

do you agree with the decision to cut penises off forcefully, did it prevent famine and/or disease?

did the UN population fund get established as the report suggests? yes no?, did women get a greater voice in the decision making in their life and get better workplace opportunity as the report suggests?
 

Psycho Doggie

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
18,810
Reaction score
27,201
A bigger population isn't taking shit away from the elite, that's why they're the elite. If anything a bigger population = more slaves for them. Look at us peasants fighting amongst our selves while they hoard all this imaginary wealth.
Stop using logic, you're going to confuse people
 

Rodzilla

Terry Lamb 1996
Joined
Dec 22, 2004
Messages
42,614
Reaction score
6,185
what a coincidence, in december 1974 the kissinger report recommends that the world bank, the UN population fund and other funders provide funding in exchange for 'integrated health and family planning services' and then in 1975 the Indians cut millions of penises in exchange for loans from the world bank, UN Population fund and the Swedish development authority

this is the biggest coincidence of all time, but i have a feeling this is directly correlated and its a conspiracy

dinkum the brain damaged dog will have a different story, that they were making hot dogs
 

Rodzilla

Terry Lamb 1996
Joined
Dec 22, 2004
Messages
42,614
Reaction score
6,185
indians sterilize worse than the nazi's

Dinkum the brain damaged dog "they needed sausage rolls for the party so its ok, its not a conspiracy"
 

Rodzilla

Terry Lamb 1996
Joined
Dec 22, 2004
Messages
42,614
Reaction score
6,185
the nazi's put millions into the gas chamber

Dinkum the brain damaged dog "that gas chamber information was obtained and common knowledge by 1955, so much for the crazy conspiracy theory to kill jews, they were open about it"
 

Hacky McAxe

Super Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Gilded
Joined
May 7, 2011
Messages
37,252
Reaction score
29,902
the nazi's put millions into the gas chamber

Dinkum the brain damaged dog "that gas chamber information was obtained and common knowledge by 1955, so much for the crazy conspiracy theory to kill jews, they were open about it"
Dude. I know this has turned into a comedy thread but honestly.... Nice work. Your jokes are great!
 

Doogie

Kennel Lizard Lord
Joined
Oct 6, 2012
Messages
9,923
Reaction score
12,429
Does being an out and out conspiracy nutter make u non binary?

Just trying to keep it on thread.
 

Psycho Doggie

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
18,810
Reaction score
27,201
Again, I think Stranger Danger is a much more tangible and realistic topic that kids should have awareness about at this age than any gender specification etc. That's not an absurd statement is it?
One issue is sexual, the other isn't. There's plenty of kids shows that teach stranger danger. But they say, "stranger danger".
Sorry about the tangent, I can't help but notice this when it comes up, and it is at least somewhat related to the wider discussion. "Stranger danger" as a broad concept for protecting children has mostly not worked. The simple reason is the vast majority of people who suffer abuse as kids do so at the hands of a non-stranger. I say "people", because they are usually middle aged adults by the time they find they need to address the trauma. The stories are so similar that you can practically have a list that you tick off. Grandad, uncle, dad, teacher, priest, minister, cub scout leader... and from there the story goes on, leaving you feeling sick to your stomach. "Stranger danger" is almost a myth (not quite, it does happen, but it is comparatively rare). The account of the abuse is then followed by an account of the disbelief the child received when they tell an authority figure in their life (too often, sadly, mum), and the whole "swept under the rug" effect takes place. In all the times I've sat and listened to someones story, not once has the abuse come at the hands of a stranger. But the abuse that does come, being from someone who was trusted by that innocent child, is that much worse because of the breach of trust.

We aren't good at talking about this as a society, which is why by and large it still gets swept under carpet.
 

B-Train

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
32,891
Reaction score
49,278
Sorry about the tangent, I can't help but notice this when it comes up, and it is at least somewhat related to the wider discussion. "Stranger danger" as a broad concept for protecting children has mostly not worked. The simple reason is the vast majority of people who suffer abuse as kids do so at the hands of a non-stranger. I say "people", because they are usually middle aged adults by the time they find they need to address the trauma. The stories are so similar that you can practically have a list that you tick off. Grandad, uncle, dad, teacher, priest, minister, cub scout leader... and from there the story goes on, leaving you feeling sick to your stomach. "Stranger danger" is almost a myth (not quite, it does happen, but it is comparatively rare). The account of the abuse is then followed by an account of the disbelief the child received when they tell an authority figure in their life (too often, sadly, mum), and the whole "swept under the rug" effect takes place. In all the times I've sat and listened to someones story, not once has the abuse come at the hands of a stranger. But the abuse that does come, being from someone who was trusted by that innocent child, is that much worse because of the breach of trust.

We aren't good at talking about this as a society, which is why by and large it still gets swept under carpet.
Yeah I understand that, it was a throw away line amidst a million replies.. You're right, most of the time the abuse is from someone that knows them.. Still, my point was don't let anyone touch you, don't let anyone invite you into a car, take you away etc no matter what they say...

Even with more distant family or close friends/friends parents never go with them unless we tell you about it before hand and always wait for us/teacher/Grandparents etc.. Those messages are more important for kids to understand than whether they should consider being non-binary or how to deal with non-binary people when it's a show designed for pre school and early primary school kids..
 

DinkumDog

Kennel Immortal
2 x Gilded
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
23,164
Reaction score
42,726
so why did they classify it and express ways to hide that they are doing it?

first of all depopulation is not strictly murdering people already born, its any action taken to reduce the population and i argue that it includes reducing the population in the future compared to what it would have been

but ok lets just go with your theory that depopulation is only about murder, let me create a new word that describes taking action that limits the growth of the world population, lets call it MATATESHI

so the kissinger report is about a conspiracy to MATATESHI, they want to secretly MATATASHI so they put it down on paper

and so lets compare the report to things that actually happened in the world and then lets see if they implemented it or not, lets see what they mean by providing services

1. Encouraging the World Bank and other international funding mechanisms, through the U.S. representatives on the boards of these organizations, to take a broader initiative in the development of inexpensive service delivery mechanisms in countries wishing to expand such systems.

2. Indicating U.S. willingness (as the U.S. did at the World Population Conference) to join with other donors and organizations to encourage and support further action by LDC governments and other institutions in the low- cost delivery systems area. A. As offered at Bucharest, the U.S. should join donor countries, WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF and the World Bank to create a consortium to offer assistance to the more needy developing countries to establish their own low-cost preventive and curative public health systems reaching into all areas of their countries and capable of national support within a reasonable period. Such systems would include family planning services as an ordinary part of their overall services. B. The WHO should be asked to take the leadership in such an arrangement and is ready to do so. Apparently at least half of the potential donor countries and the EEC's technical assistance program are favourably inclined. So is the UNFPA and UNICEF. The U.S., through its representation on the World Bank Board, should encourage a broader World Bank initiative in this field, particularly to assist in the development of inexpensive, basic health service infrastructures in countries wishing to undertake the development of such systems.

so this report was in december 1974, so lets see what happened in 1975 in india, maybe you should make some phone calls to confirm this with your indian telemarketer friends

India's dark history of sterilisation - BBC News

India's dark history of sterilisation


The drive to sterilise began in the 1970s when, encouraged by loans amounting to tens of millions of dollars from the World Bank, the Swedish International Development Authority and the UN Population Fund, India embarked on an ambitious population control programme.
During the 1975 Emergency - when civil liberties were suspended - Sanjay Gandhi, son of the former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, began what was described by many as a "gruesome campaign" to sterilise poor men. There were reports of police cordoning off villages and virtually dragging the men to surgery.

An astonishing 6.2 million Indian men were sterilised in just a year, which was "15 times the number of people sterilised by the Nazis", according to science journalist Mara Hvistendahl. Two thousand men died from botched operations.



ok so what do you think happened here? did the Gandhi son understand himself that he needed to cut millions of penises, was he a trendsetter and hero to the transgender community? was he looking to open a sausage factory and this was the easiest way to produce sausage? or did they actually follow through with the kissinger report and bribed the indians to do it, or as the report stated "encourage the world bank and other funding mechanisms to developing delivery mechanisms for providing integrated health and family planning services"

do you agree with the decision to cut penises off forcefully, did it prevent famine and/or disease?

did the UN population fund get established as the report suggests? yes no?, did women get a greater voice in the decision making in their life and get better workplace opportunity as the report suggests?
Sheesh, TLDR - more nuttery no doubt.
At a glance, something about secret words, telemarketers and the World Bank running a sausage factory. Yep, sounds like the perfectly viable conclusions of a normal, balanced individual :tearsofjoy:.
 

Rodzilla

Terry Lamb 1996
Joined
Dec 22, 2004
Messages
42,614
Reaction score
6,185
Dude. I know this has turned into a comedy thread but honestly.... Nice work. Your jokes are great!
did the kissinger report recommend that the world bank and UN population fund deliver money in exchange for family planning services? yes or no?

did this report get signed into official US policy? yes or no?

in the next year did the Indian government forcibly sterilize millions of indians, killing thousands, in exchange for money from the world bank and UN population fund? yes or no?

for somebody with an interest in the subject you and doogie haven't really added much, for example you can condemn this activity and call it a conspiracy, or you might even want to praise it...
 

Psycho Doggie

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
18,810
Reaction score
27,201
Yeah I probably meant liberalism. I’ll take your word for the rest as I only ever hear it coming from the woke, e.g against J.K Rowling and Dave Chappelle etc. I’m probably left of centre but think most of the woke stuff is just nonsense.
JK Rowling is an interesting case. She has been cancelled by people on opposite sides of the social/political spectrum. She has literally had her books burned by conservative American evangelicals because they promoted witchery and devil worship, and by progressive LGBT+, transgender supporters because of her (quite reserved) comments about the subject of gender in particular regarding feminism. Can't help but think that when someone is getting hated by every extreme on the spectrum they must be doing something right...
 

Rodzilla

Terry Lamb 1996
Joined
Dec 22, 2004
Messages
42,614
Reaction score
6,185
Sheesh, TLDR - more nuttery no doubt.
At a glance, something about secret words, telemarketers and the World Bank running a sausage factory. Yep, sounds like the perfectly viable conclusions of a normal, balanced individual :tearsofjoy:.
oh yeah, TLDR, the way to avoid it

very convenient because if you did read it then you would be forced to admit there was a conspiracy
 
Top