Blue_boost
Kennel Enthusiast
- Joined
- May 19, 2014
- Messages
- 4,119
- Reaction score
- 2,300
Did you know that in august 2006 the planet Pluto ceased to become counted as a planet due to its dwarf size. Kicked out of the solar system because it was too small.
It’s leads me to think country’s claiming big populations of people may be producing some very small humans. So I’m looking for an apples to apples comparison with population.
Would the kennel consider adult males of less than 5 foot 5 inches to be extremely small and adult females shorter than 5 feet tall as too small. Perhaps we could agree because under a certain height we acknowledge them as say 0.7 full size human equivalent.. so populations could be stated as say a million equivalent humans?
the disclaimer to this if these short people have more than $1m net assets to their name they be counted as one equivalent human?
If Pluto was punted out of the solar system for being a dwarf, should we not apply the same principle to population?
perhaps a referendum to effect this change? We could rely on the yes voters to vote this in and then everyone over 5 foot 5 inches would likely vote this in? Even some of the short people may concede they should be counted at a rate of 0.7 full size human equivalent?
It’s leads me to think country’s claiming big populations of people may be producing some very small humans. So I’m looking for an apples to apples comparison with population.
Would the kennel consider adult males of less than 5 foot 5 inches to be extremely small and adult females shorter than 5 feet tall as too small. Perhaps we could agree because under a certain height we acknowledge them as say 0.7 full size human equivalent.. so populations could be stated as say a million equivalent humans?
the disclaimer to this if these short people have more than $1m net assets to their name they be counted as one equivalent human?
If Pluto was punted out of the solar system for being a dwarf, should we not apply the same principle to population?
perhaps a referendum to effect this change? We could rely on the yes voters to vote this in and then everyone over 5 foot 5 inches would likely vote this in? Even some of the short people may concede they should be counted at a rate of 0.7 full size human equivalent?