- Joined
- Aug 4, 2007
- Messages
- 23,684
- Reaction score
- 11,174
Blaming the board for the mess the club has been in, which is improving, would be like blaming Obama for Americas shot economy
We need to support the ticket that Todd wants. No ifs or buts.
Love to believe you Matto and I hope its true but you'd paint a beautiful picture anyway even if they were shooting babies out of cannons.The club has done a great job since the changes in February.
When they took charge this year we had a virtual reserve grade, an image shot to pieces, Mason's departure and no training base.
We had to make 15 changes in staff for a variation of reasons and we had to rebuild the platform of the club. The CEO came along and he had no time to feed his feet, whilst building for the long-term future.
We've signed players, we've cleaned up our image and we've strengthened in key off field areas. Our club has seen the importance to many areas, which were neglected in the past.
Aaron has made a comment about the professionalism and innovation of Todd and Kirk compared to the previous regime. Aaron has dealt with both organisations first hand and has stated his opinions.
We need to support the ticket that Todd wants. No ifs or buts.
What do you make of Aaron's comments and search Aaron all you want as he posted them up there for all to readLove to believe you Matto and I hope its true but you'd paint a beautiful picture anyway even if they were shooting babies out of cannons.
This is on topic Luke. DJ asked a question about bias and people are answering that. For the record I spoke to DJ last week about what I firmly believe to be bias and censoring from four moderators in here (I named them to DJ) and DJ has been very helpful.boys lets keep the posts on topic, we already have a thread going on the merits of the current board no need for 2 going at the same time.
This is on topic Luke. DJ asked a question about bias and people are answering that. For the record I spoke to DJ last week about what I firmly believe to be bias and censoring from four moderators in here (I named them to DJ) and DJ has been very helpful.[/quot
thats great you've talked about bias on the site with dj, member input on any forum is always valuable and can only make the site better.
Name the four.This is on topic Luke. DJ asked a question about bias and people are answering that. For the record I spoke to DJ last week about what I firmly believe to be bias and censoring from four moderators in here (I named them to DJ) and DJ has been very helpful.
My point is you are so biased anyway you probably are right but how can anyone trust you to not put a positive spin on things?What do you make of Aaron's comments and search Aaron all you want as he posted them up there for all to read
I'm not a moderator and I wasn't censoring certain opinions and banning certain users who backed a way the club should be run different to what some of the moderators wanted it to be. DJ is a firm believer in freedom of speech (within boundaries of course) and some of the moderators chose not to go down that path. So I complained and was justified. I'm biased towards the Bulldogs.My point is you are so biased anyway you probably are right but how can anyone trust you to not put a positive spin on things?
Well the rival ticket should learn to shut their mouth.And I got no qualms with Deimus, Ben, Dogs18 or Giant posting on here. What my qualm is that one point of view was being censored and Dogs18 has let out too much about the rival ticket challenge
agreedWell the rival ticket should learn to shut their mouth.
Agreed?
At the same time nominations were being sent out both Mitch and myself (noted Greenberg supporters) got banned without warnings or infractions. The message was simply from Nash "PM Spam and also you suck". Considering I barely send PM's it wasn't a valid reason and 'you suck' is very mature indeed from supposedly the No.2 in charge. Whilst I won't name all four moderators I'm happy to name Nash that I complained about.agreed
at the same time, if what matt says is true in regards to rival tickets being allowed to advertise while the current admin are getting censored, then that bias needs to be reigned in
either both get airplay or little/none at all
but i still agree with ya champ, my preference is for none, but then, it's not my website
Lol. Thats gold !!I remember one time when I got banned from the Kennel, I sat in a corner and sulked like a b*tch. I mean I could have simply joined another forum but I chose to constantly bring it up and play the victim over a FCUKING INTERNET FORUM FFS!