- Joined
- Mar 10, 2013
- Messages
- 18,161
- Reaction score
- 3,170
What's it about?
urgh the twitter status aint showing, can anyone help me out?
What's it about?
urgh the twitter status aint showing, can anyone help me out?
Yeah it is pretty odd, didn't a doctor come out and says the so called marks didn't resemble human teeth marks?It makes a mockery of the judiciary. Graham got 12 weeks for an alleged bite. If there was a bite, it was innocuous. The other pom Burgess, only gets two weeks for a disgraceful act that could have caused serious injury. Wheres the justice.
So if you can't beat the princesses, join them in their princessery by princessing about their aforementioned princessing?is Graham an animal now? ffs just accept it and move on its embarrassing enough that the Clubs reputation has been mistakenly staked on it without princessing it up a year later.
Ok come on, it's not that hard to understand. I don't think he did it and while the footage looks bad I think it proves nothing. In fact I think if he had a chomp for as long as the footage indicated, Slaters ear would have been shredded.umm what?
Who Farkn cares what anyone else thinks !!! He said he didn't do it , the coach and the CEO backed him , thats good enough for me.I love Graham and hate Slater so I don't give a ****.
let's be honest for a second though. If that footage we all saw was of Slater in Grahams place you would blow up massively and say that anything inconclusive was a load of shit. Then, if their CEO came out and said the Clubs rep was based on it you would feel sorry for the Melbourne supporters.
btw , I don't care either if you don't share my opinion on it. The whole viewing Public (minus some Bulldog supporters) do.
I don't care what anyone else thinks tbh. If you get passed it by that rationale then good for you.
Who Farkn cares what anyone else thinks !!! He said he didn't do it , the coach and the CEO backed him , thats good enough for me.
As far as i'm concerned nobody was bitten.