Gay Marriage

What's your opinion on Gay Marriage

  • For it

    Votes: 33 46.5%

  • Against it

    Votes: 36 50.7%

  • Too weak to have an opinion - sitting on the fence

    Votes: 2 2.8%
  • Total voters
    71
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am on the border (ie I'd do it with a biwoman and a friend of hers or watch lol) with women who are bi/lesbian for some reason, it only really applies if said girl is a looker and likes to have fun. No dykes or Butches please...

But I have noticed women like to try and toy around with other women these days especially in my age group. Call me a hypocrite but if a girl is bi, a looker, wants to get it on and invite a friend my dick will not say no lol
 
Marley said:
I read an article in one of my sisters girly mags (don't hate) and apparently there is a rise in bisexual females and they enjoy fun on the side with there bestfriends...where the **** are these girls ffs. Anyone having any luck??
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure they all live on the Mythical Island of beautiful women.
 
tonee said:
have a break!
Click to expand...

Hi Tonee, just a quick question regarding the banning. You stated that "Abusive language towards another forum member is not required on this forum." However, in the Chan/Sukamryan thread you were happy to partake in personal abuse and there was also editing of regular members posts by moderators for the sole purpose of attempting to humiliate and undermine the member.

Would you kindly make it clear exactly what the standard is here, so that both myself and the other forum members here are aware in the future?

I would hate to think that you act on a whim, or that you apply different standards to different members, so your explanation will hopefully clear things up for me. Thank you :grinning:
 
Book said:
Hi Tonee, just a quick question regarding the banning. You stated that "Abusive language towards another forum member is not required on this forum." However, in the Chan/Sukamryan thread you were happy to partake in personal abuse and there was also editing of regular members posts by moderators for the sole purpose of attempting to humiliate and undermine the member.

Would you kindly make it clear exactly what the standard is here, so that both myself and the other forum members here are aware in the future?

I would hate to think that you act on a whim, or that you apply different standards to different members, so your explanation will hopefully clear things up for me. Thank you :grinning:
Click to expand...

There are 2 rules for the Kennel:

1- The Mods are always right
2- Incase the mods are wrong, check rule number 1.

I hope that helps.
 
In the words of Arnold... Gay marriage is something between a man and a woman lol
 
The Greatest said:
There are 2 rules for the Kennel:

1- The Mods are always right
2- Incase the mods are wrong, check rule number 1.

I hope that helps.
Click to expand...

That's how power hungry mods like yourself really think.
 
Book got banned for ripping into Robbie F.

Then he came back to stir the pot more. Then The Greatest made his sarcastic post.

And Robbie had a go at TG? Almost in defence of Book??? :confused:
 
dogkat said:
Book got banned for ripping into Robbie F.

Then he came back to stir the pot more. Then The Greatest made his sarcastic post.

And Robbie had a go at TG? Almost in defence of Book??? :confused:
Click to expand...


LMAO.. Crazy isn't?

I love how you get it..
 
I think we all need to take a deep breath.

I was fairly proud of this thread, it was a whole bunch of people actually discussing the pros and cons (not that I can really see any cons) of gay marriage (or simply marriage)

the someone nearly vomited (not that I really understand how a picture of 2 people kissing could actually do that - must be a really weak stomach)

Then someone was called a faggot

And I was like

Boy-That-Escalated-Quickly-Anchorman.gif


Also, I do not think Faggot is the insult people believe it to be

here is the definition

faggot
ˈfaɡət/
noun
1.BRITISH a ball or roll of seasoned chopped liver, baked or fried.
2. a bundle of sticks bound together as fuel.
verb
1. archaic bind in or make into faggots.
2. (in embroidery) join by faggoting.

but in all seriousness, are we all not adult enough to realise this is a REALLY polarising subject, and my opinion will be the exact opposite of someone else's and we will NEVER agree on this. Or, has this thread descended into name calling because we are simply unable to rebuff one opposing comment using reason. GROW UP, this is a serious subject that is important to a lot of people who feel prejudiced against because of their sexual orientation.

tumblr_nf1ttdmgA91s0my1wo1_500.gif
 
Agree, people were having a civilised discussion, and i loved reading the for and against point of views.. there are some intelligent arguments been put through..
 
The Greatest said:
Agree, people were having a civilised discussion, and i loved reading the for and against point of views.. there are some intelligent arguments been put through..
Click to expand...



7LAqMVFxOGPAc.gif
 
dogkat said:
Book got banned for ripping into Robbie F.

Then he came back to stir the pot more. Then The Greatest made his sarcastic post.

And Robbie had a go at TG? Almost in defence of Book??? :confused:
Click to expand...

I was talking about another subject not this one.
 
Ecca said:
I think we all need to take a deep breath.

I was fairly proud of this thread, it was a whole bunch of people actually discussing the pros and cons (not that I can really see any cons) of gay marriage (or simply marriage)

the someone nearly vomited (not that I really understand how a picture of 2 people kissing could actually do that - must be a really weak stomach)
Click to expand...



Indians and pakis are not meant to be together, see how it caused unrest on this thread. lol
 
Ecca said:
I think we all need to take a deep breath.

I was fairly proud of this thread, it was a whole bunch of people actually discussing the pros and cons (not that I can really see any cons) of gay marriage (or simply marriage)

the someone nearly vomited (not that I really understand how a picture of 2 people kissing could actually do that - must be a really weak stomach)

Then someone was called a faggot

And I was like

Boy-That-Escalated-Quickly-Anchorman.gif


Also, I do not think Faggot is the insult people believe it to be

here is the definition

faggot
ˈfaɡət/
noun
1.BRITISH a ball or roll of seasoned chopped liver, baked or fried.
2. a bundle of sticks bound together as fuel.
verb
1. archaic bind in or make into faggots.
2. (in embroidery) join by faggoting.

but in all seriousness, are we all not adult enough to realise this is a REALLY polarising subject, and my opinion will be the exact opposite of someone else's and we will NEVER agree on this. Or, has this thread descended into name calling because we are simply unable to rebuff one opposing comment using reason. GROW UP, this is a serious subject that is important to a lot of people who feel prejudiced against because of their sexual orientation.

tumblr_nf1ttdmgA91s0my1wo1_500.gif
Click to expand...
Well gaytime is a very nice ice cream but for 2 man it means some other type of cream
 
The problem with any religious reasoning is that not all people follow the same religion or any religion at all, so it is grossly unfair to impose the rules of a religion on someone who is not a follower.
 
Book said:
The problem with any religious reasoning is that not all people follow the same religion or any religion at all, so it is grossly unfair to impose the rules of a religion on someone who is not a follower.
Click to expand...

It's a Christian country. That's why Christmas and Easter are public holidays.
 
True, but Christmas and Easter were around before the birth of Christ (in other forms), and we also have many non-Christian traditions in Australia.

We don't ban pre-marital sex. We don't ban gay sex. We don't ban working on Sundays. We allow for other religions to have their own celebrations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top