Cricket 2024-25 Thread

Doogie

Kennel Lizard Lord
Joined
Oct 6, 2012
Messages
13,048
Reaction score
16,486
Agree was an OTT punishment at the time if we stuck to the actual ICC rules and they would have got a 1 game suspension no one would have cared much. It was only bad as it was stupid to do it on camera let’s not pretend other things have been used to “ball tamper”.

Couldn’t care less if he’s the best captain on the field he should captain
U know this is the most jacked excuse ever. Arguing that because I did a longer punishment than others, I should be excused quicker.

No one in the cricket community has ever forgiven Greg Chappell for underarm and that was legal. Why should these cheats get a free ride?
 

Doogie

Kennel Lizard Lord
Joined
Oct 6, 2012
Messages
13,048
Reaction score
16,486
Faf ball tampered and still captained the saffas team.
He's a cheat as well. Oh - if the saffers kicked faf out of the game you think the Bunnings boys go for it? Instead he's now used as the argument for why poor cheating Smithy got hard done by.

We kick dudes out for bowling noballs for $$$'s. We don't for dudes who are trying to cheat to win games. Gambling is more important than the sports integrity?

Another jacked argument.
 

Brendan7

Kennel Addict
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
5,881
Reaction score
3,864
U know this is the most jacked excuse ever. Arguing that because I did a longer punishment than others, I should be excused quicker.

No one in the cricket community has ever forgiven Greg Chappell for underarm and that was legal. Why should these cheats get a free ride?
FAF did it twice difference was he served a game and no one even remembers about it but CA in their wisdom wants to adhere to opinions of blokes who barely watch the game…and cost us two of our very best players for a silly amount of time. A match was fine, make it 2 if you want to make a statement but that’s plenty why go way over the guidelines. Will never agree with the punishment was too much.
 

Doogie

Kennel Lizard Lord
Joined
Oct 6, 2012
Messages
13,048
Reaction score
16,486
FAF did it twice difference was he served a game and no one even remembers about it but CA in their wisdom wants to adhere to opinions of blokes who barely watch the game…and cost us two of our very best players for a silly amount of time. A match was fine, make it 2 if you want to make a statement but that’s plenty why go way over the guidelines. Will never agree with the punishment was too much.
ICC Guidelines were such because they never cracked on it. And guess what, everyone had their go.

Funny eh. Back in the day we turfed people for chucking. Ian Meckiff for example. Now, we change the rules to justify dodgy actions. If you want to support a lack of integrity in the game so you can fanboy, sweet. Not me, gave a lot to the game and got a lot back. Too much respect.

And give ya the tip. The admin did not cost 'us' Smith and Warner. They don't decide to redecorate the ball, we aren't having this conversation. Doing a crime and the whinging about the punishment? Bad luck. You got a harder judge. But still not hard enough.
 

Bulldog1966

Kennel Legend
Joined
Oct 26, 2020
Messages
14,901
Reaction score
16,336
Mutterings by some(Tim Paine for one the dh)Konstas might make way for Head who they prefer to open in SL.
Would be much better to push Khawaja down the order he has a great record at 5 on the subcontinent and is near to our best player of spin.

No time now to be dropping the kid that would be a shithouse move imo.
 

Mr 95%

Kennel Immortal
Gilded
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
25,410
Reaction score
29,625
ICC Guidelines were such because they never cracked on it. And guess what, everyone had their go.

Funny eh. Back in the day we turfed people for chucking. Ian Meckiff for example. Now, we change the rules to justify dodgy actions. If you want to support a lack of integrity in the game so you can fanboy, sweet. Not me, gave a lot to the game and got a lot back. Too much respect.

And give ya the tip. The admin did not cost 'us' Smith and Warner. They don't decide to redecorate the ball, we aren't having this conversation. Doing a crime and the whinging about the punishment? Bad luck. You got a harder judge. But still not hard enough.
Exactly, they chose to cheat, them, and them alone. They completely deserved their suspension. I had no problem them serving their time, then returning to the Australian team, however, Smith should not have been appointed captain again.

Just a note: I couldn’t care less what other countries do, it’s what Australia does that is important to me. If they want to lead the world in stamping out cheating, as they have called out other countries when they do it, then they’ve gotta make sure that they do it firstly in their own backyard with substantial punishments.
 

Psycho Doggie

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
22,080
Reaction score
33,243
My first thought when I saw the ground at Ninja stadium tonight was "those ropes are too close to the fence". Wonder what Ellis is thinking rn...
 

wendog33

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
Ladder Champion
Joined
Aug 6, 2016
Messages
28,359
Reaction score
33,137
Article by Greg Chappel...bit of a go at our development and selecting process before the Ashes.

"As the cricketing world looks towards the next Ashes series in Australia, the narrative has shifted in a way few would have predicted a couple of years ago. England, under the bold and transformative leadership of Ben Stokes and coach Brendon McCullum, are not just rebuilding, they are surging ahead with a team that looks equipped to dominate for a generation.
Central to this optimism is the emergence of Harry Brook, a batting sensation whose performances and approach I compare to the great Sachin Tendulkar. Remarkably, Brook’s early career stats suggest he might even have outpaced the Indian maestro in terms of impact at the same stage."



Play Video


Sixers fume over controversial BBL catch


Sixers fume over controversial BBL catch
Play video
0:56
Sixers fume over controversial BBL catch

The Sydney Sixers were fuming when Jack Edwards was given out to a contentious caught and bowled by Usama Mir.

"At just 25, Brook has rapidly become one of the most talked-about cricketers in the world. He boasts a simple but devastatingly effective batting method. Much like Tendulkar in his early years, Brook doesn’t move excessively in the crease before the ball is delivered. His stability and minimalistic technique allow him to read the angles of the bowler and adjust his strokes with precision. The result? An extraordinary ability to score from most deliveries, whether they’re pitched full, short or on an awkward length.
Tendulkar’s early brilliance lay in his ability to use the bowler’s pace to his advantage, scoring heavily on both sides of the wicket. Brook, though a bigger and more powerful player physically, has a strikingly similar ability to manipulate the field with wristy flicks, crunching drives, and punishing back-foot shots.

It’s a simple method, but simplicity often breeds greatness.
Comparing their first 15 Tests reveals an eye-opening narrative. Tendulkar scored 837 runs at an average of just under 40, with a couple of centuries. Brook, in contrast, had made 1378 runs at an average of nearly 60, with five hundreds. To be fair, Sachin was still a teenager while Brook is in his mid-20s.
Brook’s ability to combine aggression with consistency makes him a nightmare for bowlers because, much like Tendulkar, he’s incredibly hard to contain. For England, he’s not just a bright prospect, he’s a player around whom their future could be built."
Harry Brook bats during the Headingley Test in the 2023 Ashes series.

Harry Brook bats during the Headingley Test in the 2023 Ashes series.Credit:Getty Images

"But England’s newfound confidence isn’t founded solely on Brook’s talent. The team’s rebuild has been deliberate, forward-thinking, and highly effective. Under Stokes and McCullum, the focus has shifted from cautious consolidation to fearless expression. England are no longer playing to survive, they’re playing to win, and they’re building a team capable of sustaining success for years to come.


Consider the mix of players stepping into key roles. Joe Root, the senior statesman of the side, continues to churn out runs and tons with a serene calm that belies the frenetic energy around him. In the annals of batting, he is in rarefied air.
Zak Crawley and Ben Duckett, both relatively young, have shown flashes of brilliance at the top of the order, while Ollie Pope has established himself as a reliable anchor at No.3. Jacob Bethell and Jamie Smith complete the new-look England batting line-up."
Sam Konstas hits a boundary against India at the SCG.

Sam Konstas hits a boundary against India at the SCG. Credit:AP

"In the bowling department, the rejuvenation is equally evident. Brydon Carse and Gus Atkinson, both in their late 20s, are emerging as serious options, combining raw pace with the ability to exploit even the flattest tracks. Add the reliable Matthew Potts into the mix, and England’s pace arsenal looks as sharp and varied as it has in decades. The incisive pair of Mark Wood and Jofra Archer are being kept in cotton wool and are likely to be unleashed in Australia as enforcers.
Crucially, this rebuild isn’t just about talent, it’s about a mindset shift. England’s players, regardless of experience, are encouraged to embrace risk and take the game to the opposition. The result is a team that doesn’t fear failure, but thrives on pressure.

Australia, by contrast, appear to be clinging to an ageing core. While the likes of Pat Cummins, Steve Smith, and Mitchell Starc remain world-class performers, the next generation of Australian cricketers hasn’t quite stepped up. Josh Hazlewood’s recurrent injuries telegraph the vulnerability of our pace attack, while the middle-order batting relies heavily on Marnus Labuschagne, Steve Smith and Travis Head.
Australia’s batting lacks youthful exuberance, with few players in their 20s knocking on the selectors’ door. Sam Konstas has shown promise, but there’s little evidence to suggest Australia have the same depth of young talent as England. The upcoming tour of Sri Lanka and the World Test Championship final will be critical opportunities for Australia to address this imbalance.
However, whether they can build momentum in time for the Ashes remains to be seen. The return of a fit Cameron Green can change the look of the Australian team significantly.
Ever since Douglas Jardine unleashed Harold Larwood in the Bodyline series in 1932-33, Ashes contests have largely been defined by the fast bowlers.
England’s ability to unearth and develop a new generation of pacemen gives them a significant edge.
Under Stokes, England play with an infectious swagger. They don’t just aim to win, they aim to dominate. This attitude, coupled with McCullum’s aggressive philosophies, has allowed England to forge a fearless and entertaining team identity.

Brook embodies this new ethos: he bats with a sense of inevitability. Bowlers know he’ll score, but they don’t know how to stop him. This psychological edge cannot be overstated. By the time Brook walks to the crease, the fielding side is already under pressure.
The contrast between England and Australia couldn’t be starker: England’s rebuild has unearthed a generation of players ready to make their mark. Australia, on the other hand, are struggling to unearth the young talent that we know re-energises a squad.
We are struggling because we made a catastrophic decision some years ago to dismantle a world leading high-performance system that was doing a fantastic job of throwing up new talent. The states have been entrusted with a job for which they are ill-equipped. The states do a great job of identifying the best young players within their boundaries to play first-class cricket, but it is Cricket Australia’s job to produce players to represent Australia.
It is proven that talent develops in a hot-bed environment where the best young players learn as much from each other as they do from coaches and more from playing meaningful games under pressure than from a million throw-downs far removed from the reality of match situations.

Our talent pool is much shallower than that of India or England, so we can’t afford to waste a single player. State coaches are employed to win silverware so, understandably, they choose experience over talent nearly every time, which means that young players are missing the challenges they need at the critical time in their development to allow them to become the marquee players that we need.
By the time we realise that this system is not working, we will have set ourselves back 10 years. England have every reason to feel confident. They are no longer in the shadow of the great Australian sides of the past; they are leading a new era of cricket. With a team built for the future and a fearless approach to the game, England head to Australia not just hoping to compete but expecting to win.
For Australia, the challenge is clear: adapt or risk being left behind. The Ashes have always been a battle of skill, nerve, and mindset. On current form, England appear to hold the edge. The stage is set for a humdinger of a series that could redefine the balance of power in world cricket."
 

Bulldog1966

Kennel Legend
Joined
Oct 26, 2020
Messages
14,901
Reaction score
16,336
Scorchers are done, that $5 to finish top 4 looked a great bet..but they clearly know haha.
 

chemdog

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Apr 5, 2015
Messages
24,211
Reaction score
34,315
strikers a chance of making the highest big bash score?
 
Top