- May 7, 2011
- Reaction score
Urgh. This is my own stupid fault but I read your post and was curious what Rod said. So I read what Rod said. I opened his link. Read through it and sure enough it clearly dismissed what he's saying in the same article.You are a double pisser and double shit bluffer. I proved that Gauci was not involved and you are acting, lying and playing along to satisfy your sugar daddy Trump.
Rod provided all the evidence to show that he's wrong. The usual Rodnitive Bias. It reminded me again why I blocked him and why I should never read stuff he posts.
From the link:
"What did you mean by “inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory”?
This was our early conclusion based on a preliminary look at the data. As described above, there were features of the virus that appeared unique and at the time didn’t seem to have an obvious immediate evolutionary precursor. However, all the features in SARS-CoV-2 were identified in related coronaviruses in the first half of 2020, which largely invalidated the hypothesis of engineering and instead bolstered the argument for a natural origin. This is a textbook example of the scientific method, where a preliminary hypothesis is rejected in favor of a competing hypothesis as more data become available and analyses are completed."