Coronavirus.

[Dawgfather]

For the alarmists saying the vaccine was killing people in Norway, officials are saying there is no evidence of that and those who died were already ‘seriously ill’:

'We're not alarmed': Norway finds no direct link between elderly deaths and vaccine

Health authorities say there's no evidence of a direct link between the recent string of deaths among elderly people, and the COVID vaccine they received.

www.smh.com.au

for the record I am no anti vaxxer. I’ve had the annual flu jab for years now, but the more I read the less value I think vaccines (generally) have for fit healthy ppl in their 20’s and 30’s

Also from your article:

"We can't say that people die from the vaccine. We can say that it may be coincidental. It is difficult to prove that it's the vaccine which is the direct cause."

Madsen says it's possible that the side effects of immunisation can, in some cases, "tip the patients into a more serious course of the underlying disease. We can't rule that out."

 

[Hacky McAxe]

It’s been ssid so much that young girls have heard it and now repeat it (much like Greta Thunberg repeats climate change lies that she’s read online).

Message from Emma Jacobson, age 10: If we wear masks, we can stop the virus | Wisconsin Jewish Chronicle

Do you like COVID-19? Because I know I don’t. Do you like not being able to go to school and see your friends or talking to them from social distance? Because I don’t. Do you like having your camps or play dates canceled? Because I don’t. But if we wear masks every time we go outside and don’t...

www.jewishchronicle.org

“But if we wear masks every time we go outside and don’t go to restaurants, we could stop this virus.”

Even Anthony Fauci used to be honest when he spoke about masks:

“There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And, often, there are unintended consequences — people keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face.”

In fact it was only months ago that mainstream media were honest about masks.

Masks can't stop the coronavirus in the US, but hysteria has led to bulk-buying, price-gouging and serious fear for the future

Panic over the novel coronavirus is hitting a fever pitch in the US. And despite repeated pleas from health officials not to purchase them, Americans can't stop snatching up masks and respirators.

edition.cnn.com

In fact, warns US Surgeon General Dr. Jerome Adams, face masks might actually increase your risk of infection if they aren't worn properly.


U.S. surgeon general:

Seriously people- STOP BUYING MASKS!

They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching #Coronavirus

[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]

Remember when you shared this and I pointed out that the US Surgeon General changed his stance based on new data?

Remember? You should remember because you ignored that and posted it again. So I showed you again that the US Surgeon General, the WHO and the CDC all changed their stance based on new data.

And you ignored that and posted it again. What 9s this, the 4th time?

This is why I keep saying that you're a troll. Saying, "I'll accept when I'm wrong" and constantly posting lies and misinformation could only mean that you are a troll.

 

[Hacky McAxe]

Also, correlation does not equal causation. That's why actual scientific research is needed. To look at all factors and test efficacy.

 

[Dogna88]

Also, correlation does not equal causation. That's why actual scientific research is needed. To look at all factors and test efficacy.

NO HACKY. GRAPH SAY MASK MAKE WEAR THIS TIME. GRAPH SAY CASE LINE UP THIS TIME. MASK CAUSE CASE RISE. MASK MEAN BAD. ARGHHHHH NOM NOM NOM

 

[Hacky McAxe]

for the record I am no anti vaxxer. I’ve had the annual flu jab for years now, but the more I read the less value I think vaccines (generally) have for fit healthy ppl in their 20’s and 30’s

Also from your article:

"We can't say that people die from the vaccine. We can say that it may be coincidental. It is difficult to prove that it's the vaccine which is the direct cause."

Madsen says it's possible that the side effects of immunisation can, in some cases, "tip the patients into a more serious course of the underlying disease. We can't rule that out."

Other signs that you're a troll. Vaccines aren't there to protect people in their 20's and 30's. They're there for herd immunity to protect the at risk. Especially if they have a higher risk of dying from a vaccine so less likely to take it.

You know full well that masks are there to prevent infected (mask wearer) from spreading it to everyone else. But you post stuff like, "I didn't wear a mask, I didn't die"

You are a troll. There's no other explanation. I believe that you believe some of what you post but most of it is there to troll people and you couldn't care less if it's true or not.

 

[Dawgfather]

Remember when you shared this and I pointed out that the US Surgeon General changed his stance based on new data?

Remember? You should remember because you ignored that and posted it again. So I showed you again that the US Surgeon General, the WHO and the CDC all changed their stance based on new data.

And you ignored that and posted it again. What 9s this, the 4th time?

This is why I keep saying that you're a troll. Saying, "I'll accept when I'm wrong" and constantly posting lies and misinformation could only mean that you are a troll.

Which country in the northern hemisphere is your flagship example for the benefits of masks?

Im well aware he ‘changed his stance’

 

[Dogna88]

.

 

[Dawgfather]

Also, correlation does not equal causation. That's why actual scientific research is needed. To look at all factors and test efficacy.

Of course it doesn’t. However the fact there isnt data showing the virus quashed or even dented the rate of spread through use of masks says everything.

 

[Hacky McAxe]

Which country in the northern hemisphere is your flagship example for the benefits of masks?

Im well aware he ‘changed his stance’

Nah you're not. Because you can't find accurate data by looking at a single variable (masks) as a standalone factory across an entire population data that has many variables. The only way to do it is to neutrilise the other variables through use of a control.

This is why you need to read the research on the efficacy of masks. Not just looking at charts.

 

[Hacky McAxe]

Of course it doesn’t. However the fact there isnt data showing the virus quashed or even dented the rate of spread through use of masks says everything.

No it doesn't. That's the whole point of the statement.

You can't say "of course correlation doesn't equal causation" then say, "why is there no correlation between virus spread and mask use?"

In other words you can't say, "of course correlation doesn't equal causation. But why doesn't this correlate. It mustn't be the cause"

 

[Dogna88]

Nah you're not. Because you can't find accurate data by looking at a single variable (masks) as a standalone factory across an entire population data that has many variables. The only way to do it is to neutrilise the other variables through use of a control.

This is why you need to read the research on the efficacy of masks. Not just looking at charts.

NOOOOOOOO HACKY NOOOOOO. THE CHART. THE CHARTTTTT.

C IS FOR COOOKIE. AND COOKIE IS FOR ME
NOM NOM NOMMMM

 

[Dawgfather]

Masks are like communism/socialism. If the government could just use force to guarantee its citizens did it the ‘correct’ way, then it would work every time.

The only problem is that socialism/communism hasn’t worked anywhere and neither have masks.

 

[Dawgfather]

No it doesn't. That's the whole point of the statement.

You can't say "of course correlation doesn't equal causation" then say, "why is there no correlation between virus spread and mask use?"

In other words you can't say, "of course correlation doesn't equal causation. But why doesn't this correlate. It mustn't be the cause"

You’re more than welcome to wear your face diaper if you want. I think it’s good for people to have choices that are free from government tyranny.

But you won’t achieve anything through its use other than looking like a nob and furthering your own paranoia.

 

[Hacky McAxe]

Masks are like communism/socialism. If the government could just use force to guarantee its citizens did it the ‘correct’ way, then it would work every time.

The only problem is that socialism/communism hasn’t worked anywhere and neither have masks.

 

[Dogna88]

You’re more than welcome to wear your face diaper if you want. I think it’s good for people to have choices that are free from government tyranny.

But you won’t achieve anything through its use other than looking like a nob and furthering your own paranoia.

Ahhhhh seeee. Thats better dawg.

At least you can admit your true motive behind being an anti masker.

Its about slavery! You da bossssssss man. I think you should organise movement and protest to rebel against this slavery. AMLM (Anti Mask Lives Matter)

Also. Please add NOM NOM NOM to the end of your posts.

 

[wendog33]

Nah you're not. Because you can't find accurate data by looking at a single variable (masks) as a standalone factory across an entire population data that has many variables. The only way to do it is to neutrilise the other variables through use of a control.

This is why you need to read the research on the efficacy of masks. Not just looking at charts.

The major conclusion to take out of Dawg's latest "proof" against masks research he submitted, is that the researchers stipulate how necessary and important it is for extensive and improved widespread testing....something else our troll has a problem with.

 

[Dawgfather]

View attachment 20504

No I'm just pointing out the parallels between the concept of masks and socialism.

Both are ideas that are 'supposedly great', but they just haven't worked anywhere they've been used.

 

[Dawgfather]

The major conclusion to take out of Dawg's latest "proof" against masks research he submitted, is that the researchers stipulate how necessary and important it is for extensive and improved widespread testing....something else our troll has a problem with.

When it comes to places like Sydney, getting tens of thousands of people to test might make lemmings like yourself feel great, but it doesn't achieve anything other than telling everyone what we already knew (i.e. the virus is not widespread in Sydney).

Not only is the virus not widespread in Sydney, it exists in such low numbers that it almost doesn't even exist.

Which is why the idea of mandatory masks right now also makes about as much sense as Hacky suggesting he 'follows the science'.

 

[Dawgfather]

@Hacky McAxe I've worked out the best place for you to live, california! You'll fit in perfectly with all the other deluded folks there who thinks masks are effective and that we can change the temperature of the earth!

Remember kids, if you go out to eat with people you already share a house with, it will make a HUGE difference if you wear masks when you're at the restaurant together, even though you already share a bed/bathroom/kitchen and other living spaces with the same people maskless at home.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312437371460173825

"Going out to eat with members of your household this weekend? Don't forget to keep your mask on in between bites. Do your part to keep those around you healthy. #SlowtheSpread "




#maskup!

 

[wendog33]

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, EVERYONE PLEASE STOP FEEDING THE TROLL.