The minute the club anounced the 2 year extension it has automatically become a binding contract, I don't know dibshit got his law degree from but obviously it wasn't from here, the minute dib said there would be no further comments he indirectly means he is gone, if this idiot gets voted back in that will do me, if the buck stops with him then take your buck and buck out of Belmore for good you worthless turd.
The same "worthless turd" who has worked tirelessly to turn things around and work two jobs because Castle couldn't do hers. But sure.. draw and quarter him.
An MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) or HOA (Heads of Agreement) are only an intention to sign/contract, not an actual contract. In the MOUs case, a collective intention of what will be offered in a contract. Neither are contacts in themselves and both are non legally binding in any court of Australia.
If the presser mentioned that both parties have signed a contract to extend, then that can be taken as verbatim as an inference in court.
BUT if the presser mentioned they have "come to agreement" or anything about an "agreement", then it can only be taken as much as an MOU / HOA being made between parties.
Dib isn't a lawyer, but our club would work with the best.
This was what was said:
http://www.bulldogs.com.au/news/2017/04/03/hasler_extends_contr.html
That might have the club in some trouble because "surprise" "surprise" Castle shot her mouth off making a big song and dance over the signing (and would have approved it to be announced) making herself seem like the saviour of the club.
That statement is going to be hard to refute, but it will entirely depend on what's in the contract, and when it starts.
If it's an extension, it's entirely possible that it will extend only after completion of existing contract. If they terminated his current contract, the extension would not be relevant because the initial contact us no longer valid through termination.
I bet that's the angle the dogs play.