hows it rubbish? he isnt an established first grader, so making a couple of tackles and a couple of runs isnt going to aid his development. The 80 mins of NSW Cup would though.I'm NOT talking about putting him NOW
I was talking about throughout the year .. obviously you can't put him in now
and as for this 20 minutes has no benefit .. thats just rubbish TBH
There were more issues then that... there was no support play, laziness in defence, kick chases generally poor and ball handling was terrible...I thought the only thing wrong with our game against Tigers was that Holdsworth didnt lead the team around like Noddy.
It wasnt so much kicking and passing that were issuse but we had no leadership.
Barba is not going to bring any more leadership to our side. They constantly say hes good at scoring tries but as a 5-8 he still has lots to learn in setting up plays and leading a team around.
No I meant only thing wrong WITH holdsworth in that game. Sorry.There were more issues then that... there was no support play, laziness in defence, kick chases generally poor and ball handling was terrible...
Is DJ meant to do all that?
Everyone says the jump from lower grades to FG is massive ... experts btw not kennelershows it rubbish? he isnt an established first grader, so making a couple of tackles and a couple of runs isnt going to aid his development. The 80 mins of NSW Cup would though.
5/8s and halfbacks dont normally start of on the bench, well not now days due to the limited interchange rules.
he will be exposed, no one is disputing that. But they need to be ready first to be exposed. Thats the dilemma Moore has, to identify when he is ready.Everyone says the jump from lower grades to FG is massive ... experts btw not kennelers
So exposing a player to that change is vital
that is 100% correct, we dont need Hickey on the bench, we dont use up our interchanges and dont need too.FG team was winning games with 7 interchanges over 80 minutes champ
Having Barba on the bench would not have hurt them ... well it certainly didn't against the Warriors
No one is "ready" without some exposure ...he will be exposed, no one is disputing that. But they need to be ready first to be exposed. Thats the dilemma Moore has, to identify when he is ready.
Its easier for someone in the forwards as they have really a straight out plan from day dot. Make metres, create second phase play when possible and shut down the opposition defence. Same could be said for the backs.
However its the halves that cause the most headaches.
Well he thought he was ready obviously. And then realised he was wrong. I'm pretty sure if you ask him that, he would tell you this. There is no other reason that could justify it.No one is "ready" without some exposure ...
btw why did Moore have Barba in the team early in the year ? ... if you're so right and Moore doesn't like contradicting himself, why hani why ??
lol
he was dropped for the Idris fight bud .. not because he realised somethingWell he thought he was ready obviously. And then realised he was wrong. I'm pretty sure if you ask him that, he would tell you this. There is no other reason that could justify it.
I'd say Hani is right. The fact that he had him in the team then pulled him from it shows he doesnt think hes up to first grade yet.Well he thought he was ready obviously. And then realised he was wrong. I'm pretty sure if you ask him that, he would tell you this. There is no other reason that could justify it.
Yeh but he never got put back in did he. The fact that even had a fight with Idris shows hes immature.he was dropped for the Idris fight bud .. not because he realised something
letting him play for 20 mins per game is going to hurt his development, unless you want him playing both NSW Cup and FG.
I agree with Eedz, i think it's rubbish stating 20 mins per game is going to hurt Barba's development. Brent Sherwin in 2001 was used off the interchange bench, sometimes for only the last 15-20 min. This wasn't in specialist halves role either, but yet, we seen him come on really well in 2002.I'm NOT talking about putting him NOW
I was talking about throughout the year .. obviously you can't put him in now
and as for this 20 minutes has no benefit .. thats just rubbish TBH
Yes he was dropped for the Idris fight. However it was a whole year ban. Like i said before, Moore decided he wasnt cut out for FG at that point in time, hence why he put him back in NSW Cup. No coach is perfect. They are allowed to make a judgement in error once in a blue moon.he was dropped for the Idris fight bud .. not because he realised something
I realise he was never put back in, which is the problem.Yeh but he never got put back in did he. The fact that even had a fight with Idris shows hes immature.
Sherwin was actually starting in FG before the 2001 season. He stuffed up, went back to reggies, then came back up to the bench. The difference is, he actually played FG, he knew what to expect and had gained further experience. Barba hasn't.I agree with Eedz, i think it's rubbish stating 20 mins per game is going to hurt Barba's development. Brent Sherwin in 2001 was used off the interchange bench, sometimes for only the last 15-20 min. This wasn't in specialist halves role either, but yet, we seen him come on really well in 2002.
I think Barba needs to earn his spot, and by all reports he hasn't done that this season in NSW Cup. However, when he does, 20min spells wont be damaging for him, IMO.
Regardless, if a player can't handle themselves appropriately off the field then they will be less of a chance of getting onto the field. I'm not saying I completely agree with it but it seems to be part of the clubs policy.I realise he was never put back in, which is the problem.
Idris wasn't put back in either until Morris got injuried ... we could be having this conversation regarding Idris right now .. the Dally M Rookie of the Year
Immature off the field, doesn't mean he can't offer something on it