- Joined
- Nov 28, 2016
- Messages
- 16,548
- Reaction score
- 20,600
Tony Burke's reaction lol
Last edited:
More systemic rorting.
No pic...thank you for small blessingsDutton diverted grant money to handpicked safety upgrades in marginal seats
Labor has referred Peter Dutton’s Safer Communities Fund to the auditor-general after nine in 10 grants were given in Coalition seats or marginal electorates.www.smh.com.au
Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton handpicked 53 projects to share in $8.5 million for security cameras and safety lighting ahead of the last federal election, only five of which were in safe Labor seats.
The opposition has asked the Auditor-General to examine the Safer Communities Fund after departmental documents revealed Mr Dutton diverted almost half the total pool of funding away from recommended projects to his handpicked ones in January 2019.
A Home Affairs department briefing to Mr Dutton, released under freedom of information to the ABC, listed the top 70 projects able to be funded with the $17.5 million available.
It also gave him a ranked list of another 211 projects that had passed the selection criteria and recommended he pick 15 as reserves should money become available.
The minister chose 53 projects from this list – including the bottom-ranked one: improvements to a scout hall in Umina on the NSW Central Coast.
Handwritten adjustments for 19 of the recommended projects and six of the reserves freed up the money needed to cover them all.
The program’s rules allowed Mr Dutton to ignore the department’s rankings and approve any grant applications he wanted. However, his department warned “should you decide to make funding decisions that do not reflect the order of merit, you may be criticised either in the media, or by the Australian National Audit Office”.
I was going to post the pic of him as part of this story but I'm not that cruel.
Can we see charts when other federal & state governments have been in power to have comparison for balance?Analyses of Liberal Party Govt grants during their 7 years in power...over 70% of all grants given to LNP seats. Labor 22%. Independents 6%
Yes you can.Can we see charts when other federal & state governments have been in power to have comparison for balance?
@wendog33 Thank you. Is that comparing the same thing (seven major Government grant programs) and not cherry picked? If it’s comparing seven major government grants it’s a very bad look. I’d prefer to see a graph of ALL government grants over set time periods.Yes you can.
"For those wanting a comparison to ALP. he did a chart from 2007-2013, before then there were no rules or guidelines for federal grants. The four rounds of Regional Development funding grants under the ALP were split fairly evenly between ALP and LNP (see chart). The Community Development grants scheme started in 2013 at I believe something like $3.4 million and is now around $2.5 billion, and the Sports Infrastructure grants scheme started in 2018. Seems that the LNP have found taxpayer funded vote buying slush funds very beneficial to them."
View attachment 21183
That's not a proper analysis of it either.Yes you can.
"For those wanting a comparison to ALP. he did a chart from 2007-2013, before then there were no rules or guidelines for federal grants. The four rounds of Regional Development funding grants under the ALP were split fairly evenly between ALP and LNP (see chart). The Community Development grants scheme started in 2013 at I believe something like $3.4 million and is now around $2.5 billion, and the Sports Infrastructure grants scheme started in 2018. Seems that the LNP have found taxpayer funded vote buying slush funds very beneficial to them."
View attachment 21183
Yes and you can further break it down to how many people in the seat, etc etc.That's not a proper analysis of it either.
The grant system is based on a rating schedule of what areas need it the most, hence a more fair analysis would be to have that rating schedule alongside this graph to determine if funding was distributed in the manner it was intended to be
Loved hearing his announcements on lockdown. its because the vaccine is taking so long, but there’s obvious reasons there, just a quick throw off. Not we suck at managing hotel quarantine lol. Fancy telling NSW we take less returned travellers because we have a stricter, safer quarantine system. It’s a big disaster for the state we’ll lock down all of Victoria from midnight. But the tennis will continue tonight with a capacity crowd.....Dan Andrews: We have the best and most robust lockdown procedures in the whole country.
Well, practice makes perfect.