- Joined
- Jun 12, 2019
- Messages
- 1,733
- Reaction score
- 5,319
I agree about the Jackson assumption. He’s not a ball playing lock.As stupid as it sounds id rather peacher than jackson at lock
I agree about the Jackson assumption. He’s not a ball playing lock.As stupid as it sounds id rather peacher than jackson at lock
On the outer because he is shit imo..penalty/sin bin merchant and..he's shit.I'd push for Tyrone Peachey as the ball playing lock Barrett is looking for. He's already on the outer at the tigers.
2022:
8: Thompson
9: Mahoney
10: TPJ
11: Kikau
12: Jackson
13: Peachey
They probably get extra kick backs during and as an enticement to leave so they probably still consider it worth doing especially if they win a premiership and get picked in a rep side.Good point, Definitely so. I wonder wen Teddy drops off wat happens. It’s amazing players still go there then, knowing this.
You are the last thing the nrl needs.Sure, let's buy more overpriced forwards. that's a surefire recipe for success.
If we are going to bolster our pack further, we need to look at young, up and coming players who won't cost an arm and a leg. Chrichton is the last thing we need.
FMD exactly, playing shit and been shipped on by all his clubsOn the outer because he is shit imo..penalty/sin bin merchant and..he's shit.
Surely that’s on the rorters and they should be held accountable for that ? Imagine we signed a player like Napa for example and couldn’t pay him, I’m sure we would be fucked and forced to sell better players.View attachment 50113Bye bye Thompson
until the NRL signs off on the contract it isn't official (which they won't do due to salary cap). I think it's pretty dog if they had a verbal agreement and even signed contracts.Surely that’s on the rorters and they should be held accountable for that ? Imagine we signed a player like Napa for example and couldn’t pay him, I’m sure we would be fucked and forced to sell better players.
Gus will piss that system off quick smart don’t you worry about that matethe thing is the roosters seem to always have players when they are peaking and the minute they start heading down hill they are flicked off...
Meanwhile at Canterbury we keep players like Tolman and Jackson well over due date BecUse we are the family club!
I don't think there's any truth to this as the Roosters don't have a salary cap.View attachment 50113Bye bye Thompson
Doesn't work like that. I don't know if you are aware of the concept of the multiverse. But it's basically the idea that alternate versions of the universe exist. While for us the rules of this universe are applicable, the Roosters operate on a set of rules where no salary cap was ever implemented in the NRL.Surely that’s on the rorters and they should be held accountable for that ? Imagine we signed a player like Napa for example and couldn’t pay him, I’m sure we would be fucked and forced to sell better players.
Don’t often think your right but you are here.Sure, let's buy more overpriced forwards. that's a surefire recipe for success.
If we are going to bolster our pack further, we need to look at young, up and coming players who won't cost an arm and a leg. Chrichton is the last thing we need.
I don’t even want Haas. Great player, but just way too pricey.Don’t often think your right but you are here.
We need a 7, 1, 7, 13.
I’d only want to see matterson or a ball player bought and at a fair price 5-600k.
Not someone like Crichton who wants 8-9 no doubt and is just a barge type forward.
We don’t need that in the pack.
A big leader prop (Paulo was it but I’d be over the moon if we parted with Thompson and got haas) otherwise matterson for that 13 would be ideal.
Especially If jacko calls time.