- Joined
- Aug 4, 2007
- Messages
- 23,614
- Reaction score
- 11,087
Yeh but who holds a grudge on a 12 year old into their adulthood? He didn't kill anyonesounds like he was a little shit. so im ok for being called out on it
Yeh but who holds a grudge on a 12 year old into their adulthood? He didn't kill anyonesounds like he was a little shit. so im ok for being called out on it
spose it depends what he did. i know my dad still holds resentment at what my older brothers friend did to meYeh but who holds a grudge on a 12 year old into their adulthood? He didn't kill anyone
Maybe so. But Ricky is stupid making such comments to the media. He could be sued.spose it depends what he did. i know my dad still holds resentment at what my older brothers friend did to me
he could but would lose. insulting someone isn't defamationMaybe so. But Ricky is stupid making such comments to the media. He could be sued.
It fits the legal description of defamation I would’ve thought …attacking a persons character on a public forum , in this case a post match press conference to a gleefully waiting mediahe could but would lose. insulting someone isn't defamation
from my understanding it's knowingly making a false statement that tarnishes someone's reputation. what ricky just said was his opinion of the blokeIt fits the legal description of defamation I would’ve thought …attacking a persons character on a public forum , in this case a post match press conference to a gleefully waiting media
Whether he wins the defamation case is another thing
Can he prove the player is a grub?from my understanding it's knowingly making a false statement that tarnishes someone's reputation. what ricky just said was his opinion of the bloke
Quite easily and that’s why I doubt very much the family will want to pursue any legal action (they won’t want their sons indiscretions made public)Can he prove the player is a grub?
if ricky made a statement saying salmon did a specific act, it would be up to the family to prove that a) he didn't do it and b) ricky new he didn't do itCan he prove the player is a grub?
It would be a waste of money pursuing any legal action.if ricky made a statement saying salmon did a specific act, it would be up to the family to prove that a) he didn't do it and b) ricky new he didn't do it
Maybe the other parents are willing to say something.Can he prove the player is a grub?
I understand what you mean, but I think it’s the grand scale of it CD.. It was publicly broadcasted nation wide..on msm, social media, and everyone talking about it socially..at the pub, the club, in the grandstand, etc. All making judgments about your character. Just when you are a young person trying to make it in the cut throat world of professional short. I think it’s the grand scale of it..Stuart’s words went everywhere..and as you know mud sticks..Calling someone a dog isnt defamation any more than calling them a ****. Would you sue if someone called you a ****?
Now, if someone called you a cheating ****, a paedophile **** or a criminal **** of some sort, that's a different Kettle of fish.
Edit: the blanked out word is the c word.
I guess. Seeing as they say they are doing a thorough investigation lolSurely the Sharks Junior League would have a record of exactly what happened in the alledged incident in 2010. The NRL IU should contact them and obtain that record and whether any action was taken by them. Then they can get a better handle on what to do next.
Yeah Wen but how thorough is thorough? Your definition of thorough and mine, could be completely different to the IU. I hope the big broom used to sweep things under the carpet, stays in the closet.I guess. Seeing as they say they are doing a thorough investigation lol