Bateman was probably worth it. But with a low cost squad signing like this there is more cap space available for a position where we need top class, in the spine, or a prop.It's a shit signing, spin it as much as you want but he isn't what we need. We've gone from offering big money to Bateman to signing this...
Low cost? We don't know. More than likely we're probably paying overs like we have with all our squad signings. There's better options available if you want a budget type signing, want an edge get host, want a middle get Eisenhuth. Waddel is incredibly average.Bateman was probably worth it. But with a low cost squad signing like this there is more cap space available for a position where we need top class, in the spine, or a prop.
Eisenhuth is contracted, and Host really would be a backup only. Waddell has a bit more potential to create a little bit of selection pressure.Low cost? We don't know. More than likely we're probably paying overs like we have with all our squad signings. There's better options available if you want a budget type signing, want an edge get host, want a middle get Eisenhuth. Waddel is incredibly average.
More money and longer contracts help us secure players.Waddell is a solid player and has some attacking ability. But it's a position that is the least of our concerns and I don't understand why three years.
I just hope he didn't cost much and they have bigger signings coming and they finally address the spine.
Three year deals really worked out well for Napa, Chrichton, Cogger etc..More money and longer contracts help us secure players.
The things a wooden spoon team has to do to attract players. Ideally we should only be giving three years to top players (or promising players, e.g. Burton) like we've done with Cotric. This signing looks very similar to Stimson.Three year deals really worked out well for Napa, Chrichton, Cogger etc..
I think Waddell is a decent signing if cheap enough. But two years makes more sense and no one else would have been offering him three.
You do that to attract marquee signings or players plenty of other clubs are chasing. Not for squad players.The things a wooden spoon team has to do to attract players. Ideally we should only be giving three years to top players (or promising players, e.g. Burton) like we've done with Cotric. This signing looks very similar to Stimson.
Our club/recruitment team is losing in the bargaining then. We're giving these players these contracts because it's the only way for them to agree to joining us (or at least it seems that way).You do that to attract marquee signings or players plenty of other clubs are chasing. Not for squad players.
I’ve seen a fair bit of eisenhuth,and Waddell is a far better player,host good player but has errors in him,according to a couple of mates who follow the dragons,Low cost? We don't know. More than likely we're probably paying overs like we have with all our squad signings. There's better options available if you want a budget type signing, want an edge get host, want a middle get Eisenhuth. Waddel is incredibly average.
Eisenhuth went well tonight.Low cost? We don't know. More than likely we're probably paying overs like we have with all our squad signings. There's better options available if you want a budget type signing, want an edge get host, want a middle get Eisenhuth. Waddel is incredibly average.
Fuck that's ugly
This would have to be the best and most accurate use of emojis I have ever seen.