- Joined
- Apr 29, 2014
- Messages
- 24,055
- Reaction score
- 25,677
Sue could have smashed him like he did KlemmerApparently part of the agreement with Raiders is that he can't play against us in round 16. What a shame
Sue could have smashed him like he did KlemmerApparently part of the agreement with Raiders is that he can't play against us in round 16. What a shame
In this modern society all our leaders have become to week to make decisions and enforce rules. With RL the NRL is the only body which has the power to make and enforce rules.If NRL HQ had any intelligence they would take penalties for player misbehaviour out of the club's responsibilities, develop some rules so there is consistency and handle it themselves. If the offence is serious enough for the player to be deregistered then the player can't then hold a grudge against the club for penalising him for his own stupid mistake. The code itself imposed the penalty. NRL admin is inept.
What club has gotten dispensation when releasing a player?So we just released him with no dispensation whatsoever & gift Canberra a competitive shot at this year's GF? LOL is that the business acumen of our board? Please don't seek re-election you are simply inept inert gravy trainers.
It always gets talked about how all these teams will get compensation and player swaps when a player wants out but it never happens with NRL players going to another NRL team. I’m not sure why so many people thought it would happen in this case.What club has gotten dispensation when releasing a player?
He was released and we aren't paying him anything and we get roon in the cap.
That is as good as it gets these days.
No mate it’s nowhere near as good as it gets . We could have had CHN for the last 11 rounds but now we get nothing and the raiders get a quality player . He frees up fuck all cap space and we only have a week to sign a replacement.What club has gotten dispensation when releasing a player?
He was released and we aren't paying him anything and we get roon in the cap.
That is as good as it gets these days.
Every fucking club besides our piss weak board most gutless ***** in the comp you think any other top tier club would let talent under contract walk out the door with nothing in return? Nah they would sit the **** in the reggies if they got nothing. St Helens even got compensation from us.What club has gotten dispensation when releasing a player?
He was released and we aren't paying him anything and we get roon in the cap.
That is as good as it gets these days.
Never said it was a good deal.No mate it’s nowhere near as good as it gets . We could have had CHN for the last 11 rounds but now we get nothing and the raiders get a quality player . He frees up fuck all cap space and we only have a week to sign a replacement.
They shouldn’t have let him walk unless we got a player swap .
I don’t know in what universe people think this is a good deal . At the end of the season maybe . But the board bent over again
Agree. All this means is Canberra benefits because the NRL deregistered him , encouraging our club to sack him. They get a representative forward,we are left with a gap in the roster with no type of compensation. Canberra said they would go tit for tat and they have.
When was the last time an Australian club got what you are suggesting.Every fucking club besides our piss weak board most gutless c*** in the comp you think any other top tier club would let talent under contract walk out the door with nothing in return? Nah they would sit the c*** in the reggies if they got nothing. St Helens even got compensation from us.
Maybe, but we should of got compensation, no matter what the situation.Have you considered that Barrett was consulted and provided the green light for his release.
Funny how the decision on the de-registration just happened to come out in good time for the RAIDERS. If it came after the transfer deadline CHN would have had no choice but to play for us if he wanted to get paid and once he began playing for us again old wounds would have healed and he may have stayed with usNo mate it’s nowhere near as good as it gets . We could have had CHN for the last 11 rounds but now we get nothing and the raiders get a quality player . He frees up fuck all cap space and we only have a week to sign a replacement.
They shouldn’t have let him walk unless we got a player swap .
I don’t know in what universe people think this is a good deal . At the end of the season maybe . But the board bent over again
but we're taking Oka back it seems who was the worse offender ?Agree mate , can't be considered a family club if players like CHN play for you .
Full Stop .
Imagine all the other wife's everytime the team goes away to play with such a player
Last I checked he wasn't married with kidsbut we're taking Oka back it seems who was the worse offender ?
He's at the very least shown remorse, apologised etc. etc. Doesn't wipe it away but for me that goes a long way and deserves a second chance in many ways.but we're taking Oka back it seems who was the worse offender ?
You can't get electrocuted when the main switch to the house is turned off. Its when they're too lazy to do that is when something can go wrong.So am guessing given the choice , you'd take the smell or a possible shock, than the lesser money of an engineer , hey man that's fine no disrespect